[9fans] ape/psh (still) can't exec in 9vx

Hi, This was discussed about a year ago. I ran into the same problem when trying to use 9vx 0.12 (from the tarball) with a Plan9 ISO image found at http://www.kix.in/plan9/plan9.iso.bz2 (mounted it via loop and extracted all files into a root directory for 9vx, made them writable). I followed th

Re: [9fans] ape/psh (still) can't exec in 9vx

On Oct 19, 11:50 am, mirtchov...@gmail.com (andrey mirtchovski) wrote: > % ape/psh > $ uname > /bin/sh: uname: cannot execute - Access denied > % cd /sys/src/ape > % mk install > mk lib.install > mk cmd.install > mk 9src.install > [...] > cp 8.tar /386/bin/ape/tar > % ape/psh > $ uname > Plan9 > $

Re: [9fans] ape/psh can't exec in 9vx

On Oct 19, 11:50 am, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > > /bin/sh: uname: cannot execute - Access denied > > I believe that if you build a new binary from the sources > instead of using the pre-compiled binary, this bug is fixed. > The binaries are lagging behind the actual source code. > > Russ

Re: [9fans] ape/psh can't exec in 9vx

> On Oct 19, 11:50 am, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > > > > /bin/sh: uname: cannot execute - Access denied > > > I believe that if you build a new binary from the sources > > instead of using the pre-compiled binary, this bug is fixed. > > The binaries are lagging behind the actual source code

Re: [9fans] Two suggestions for ape (was: egrep for Plan9)

Charles, On Oct 23, 10:40 am, fors...@terzarima.net (Charles Forsyth) wrote: > it's /rc/bin/ape/ls that would change, not Plan 9's ls-proper. Of course ape's one. As well as I am proposing to add egrep to ape's tree not Plan9's native tree. > what does autoconf do with the `inode number'? In f

Re: [9fans] 9vx srashes when idle

On Oct 26, 1:06 am, rminn...@gmail.com (ron minnich) wrote: > this info needs more info. > > what OS? What version? What compiler? What version? > > thanks > > ron Died again (less than a minute after start) I started 9vx -t, maximized 9vx window, killed acme and shell window that are created by

Re: [9fans] 9vx srashes when idle

Hi, On Oct 26, 1:06 am, rminn...@gmail.com (ron minnich) wrote: > this info needs more info. > > what OS? What version? What compiler? What version? > > thanks > > ron uname -a Linux archgui 2.6.27-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Dec 21 09:31:10 UTC 2008 i686 QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 AuthenticAMD

Re: [9fans] 9vx srashes when idle

One more kind of trap (did not cause crash) - not sure when exactly it happened: 76 stats fault 0x33c no segment segment 0xf00 0x1000 segment 0x1000 0x1b000 segment 0x1b000 0x22000 segment 0x22000 0x3a000 76 stats: unhandled fault va=33c [97df233c] eip=33c cpu0: registers for stats 76 FLAG

Re: [9fans] Two suggestions for ape (was: egrep for Plan9)

Tim, On Oct 23, 2:23 pm, news...@lava.net (Tim Newsham) wrote: > What if you just made a command "gnuconfig" which rewrote the > configure script, fixing the minor defects, and ran the result? > Or bound in a dummy "ls" and "egrep" before executing the real > configure script? > Lets keep the in

Re: [9fans] Two suggestions for ape (was: egrep for Plan9)

On Oct 26, 9:21 am, 23h...@googlemail.com (hiro) wrote: > > Since the purpose of ape is to emulate the environment configure is > > expected to run in, and such mismatch has been found, it migh be > > easier to fix ape than to convince maintaners of autoconf to fix on > > their side... > > Why are

Re: [9fans] 9vx srashes when idle

On Oct 26, 11:09 am, rminn...@gmail.com (ron minnich) wrote: > > > Has anyone else seen these dumps with 9vx? > > never seen anything like it, which leads me to wonder if you are not > tickling a bug in the virtualization. > > ron- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It could be since it

Re: [9fans] 9vx and create (...DMEXCL)

Hi, OK, thanks for the clue. Unfortunately, this (devfs-posix.c in 9vx): if(perm & ~(DMDIR|0777)) error(Ebadarg); generates the error, and the values of DMEXCL and DMAPPEND do not seem to fit into Unix permissions. So these won't work in 9vx as long as the host filesyste

[9fans] plan9port and procexecl

Hi, I have a piece of code which compiles and works fine in Plan9: void execproc(void *v) { Channel *sync; Exec *e; int q[2]; char *cmd; threadsetname("execproc"); e = v; q[0] = e->q[0];

[9fans] Is the go9p project still maintained?

project's active repo moved please let me know, I'll resubmit the issue there. If the project is not maintained anymore I'll take care of it in my project's local repo. Thanks. -- Dmitry Golubovsky Anywhere on the Web

[9fans] Is the go9p project still maintained?

numeric ID). So even in the .u mode, fallback character username recognition is necessary to use if no valid numeric user ID can be provided. Thanks. -- Dmitry Golubovsky Anywhere on the Web