How you react to being told that you are behaving poorly, and it’s neither
appreciated or respected, speaks volumes. It’s telling, as you say, that your
take is to get defensive and, honestly, shitty. Emotional maturity may be
lacking in general on the list but please do not posture from some im
This is incredibly rude and tone-deaf. Your convictions aside, dismissing an
opinion like this is simply stonewalling, and quite frankly obliterated
whatever respect I may have started to develop for you.
> On Jan 25, 2024, at 08:44, Don Bailey wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what all this was, so I
(For system-specific booting. It will use default, by default if that suits
your needs)
> On Oct 19, 2021, at 10:47 AM, antonio@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> For PXE boot from a CPU server, I don't remember all the configuration, but I
> remember that you have to create a file with the MAC of th
I went all in on my first foray, and set up discrete fs + auth + cpu + terms,
it was fun but wholly unnecessary. Eventually I settled into fs/auth on one,
and a cpu server on the side with drawterm/terms. This was all 9front, which
has some niceties for networked setups, including cpu listeners
https://github.com/debauchee/barrier
> On Sep 4, 2021, at 9:19 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> i tried and faild to get cinap’s historic synergy client to work with a
>> current synergy server on windows/linux/osx etc.
>
> the guy behind synergy at some point tried to convert his
I’ve started toying with that very idea Lucio, but I haven’t had much time to
really vet the ideas. My work has been specifically for 9front and rcpu
> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:53 PM, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> On 7/19/21, adr via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote:
>> [ ...]. Running samterm locally is
Go builds on Plan9 suffer from the post-1.9 performance regression.
> On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:29 PM, Steve Simon wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> my plan was to build and run/debug go on a raspberry pi 4 running plan9, not
> to cross compile.
>
> i am confident in the linux cross compile environment i was j
I’ve used it, it works fine. Building on a raspberry pi, on the other hand is a
chore when using Go.
> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:46 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 22:41:48 +0100 Steve Simon wrote:
>>
>> does go run under plan9 on the radpberry pi or only on x86?
>
> I haven't trie
i tried to solve that problem on Linux, with a wm that tiled set-sized
windows in a floating grid, but it was always very, very hacky. (For the
curious, github.com/halfwit/hwwm)
On Tue., Apr. 16, 2019, 9:59 p.m. Lucio De Re, wrote:
> On 4/16/19, Marshall Conover wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > As an asi
han Gardener,
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Michael Misch wrote:
> > The whole thing is a good discussion. plan9's design works, very well;
> for about 80% of would be users. For differently abled people in any
> capacity it all falls apart quickly.
>
> Begging
The whole thing is a good discussion. plan9's design works, very well; for
about 80% of would be users. For differently abled people in any capacity
it all falls apart quickly. it's such a simple system though it wouldn't
take much work to extend support wherever needed.
On Mon., Apr. 15, 2019, 12
11 matches
Mail list logo
