On 31 May 2015 at 17:31, Ori Bernstein wrote:
> > It doesn't understand the named ... variant, which I suppose is more
> recent
> > tinkering. Use the older __VA_ARGS__.
>
> IIRC, the named variant is older, but it's also a GNU extension.
I've looked at the C99 and C1x standards and both descri
On Sun, 31 May 2015 11:14:42 +0100
Charles Forsyth wrote:
> It doesn't understand the named ... variant, which I suppose is more recent
> tinkering. Use the older __VA_ARGS__.
IIRC, the named variant is older, but it's also a GNU extension.
--
Ori Bernstein
On 25 May 2015 at 19:44, Jens Staal wrote:
> It did however not work (I guess the "..." and "##" are to blame?) so now
> I wonder how/if it is possible with the posix compiler on plan9?
It doesn't understand the named ... variant, which I suppose is more recent
tinkering. Use the older __VA_ARG
On Mon May 25 12:39:27 PDT 2015, staal1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I tried using the following shim header to satisfy in a package I
> want to build.
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libressl-portable/portable/master/include/err.h
>
> It looked pretty neat since it does everything
Hi all.
I tried using the following shim header to satisfy in a package I
want to build.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libressl-portable/portable/master/include/err.h
It looked pretty neat since it does everything in the header.
It did however not work (I guess the "..." and "##" are to bl
