The update to 10.04 has overloaded my email with messages from ubuntu's dosemu
forum. Basically the same issue as with 9vx. A fix [sic] is suggested. So,
question is:
On Sat, 1 May 2010 23:36:08 +0200
Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote:
Fwiw, 9vx does build and run fine on
Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still
in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's
where the difference lies.
How do I check if that fix you're speaking of is installed or not?
Cheers,
Mathieu
---BeginMessage---
The update to 10.04 has
On Tue, 4 May 2010 11:06:29 +0200
Mathieu Lonjaret mathieu.lonja...@gmail.com wrote:
Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still
in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's
where the difference lies.
How do I check if that fix you're
having upgraded a machine to ubunut 10.04LTS yesterday,
9vx now crashes with a segmentation violation shortly after
saying it is starting /bin/rc. has anyone else a similar
problem on that or another linux system? 9vx itself was unchanged,
but i also tried recompiling it (in case a linux include
2.6.32-21-generic according to uname -a
what kernel version is it nowadays?
ron
2.6.32-21-generic according to uname -a
or is that a combination?
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
2.6.32-21-generic according to uname -a
hmm. I'm running 9vx just fine on 2.6.33 -- a non-ubongo version. I
wonder if some ubuntu patch to the kernel has broken something?
Blast. if you do an ldd on it what libc etc.
% ldd 9vx.Linux # old
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb772)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7617000)
...
% ldd 9vx # new
linux-gate.so.1 = (0x00704000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00c35000)
...
where an obvious difference is that
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
having upgraded a machine to ubunut 10.04LTS yesterday,
9vx now crashes with a segmentation violation shortly after
saying it is starting /bin/rc. has anyone else a similar
problem on that or another linux system? 9vx
% ldd 9vx.Linux # old
...
% ldd 9vx # new
note that `old' is run on an existing 9.04 (2.6.28-18-generic), which works,
and `new' is the 10.04 (2.6.32-21-generic), which doesn't.
Fwiw, 9vx does build and run fine on 10.04 here.
Lemme know if I can give you some relevant info which might help.
Cheers,
Mathieu
---BeginMessage---
% ldd 9vx.Linux # old
...
% ldd 9vx # new
note that `old' is run on an existing 9.04 (2.6.28-18-generic), which works,
and `new' is
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
% ldd 9vx.Linux # old
...
% ldd 9vx # new
note that `old' is run on an existing 9.04 (2.6.28-18-generic), which works,
and `new' is the 10.04 (2.6.32-21-generic), which doesn't.
can you run the
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
can you run the current 9vx in 9.04?
yes
this version madness confuses me. i could not get it to run on 9.10.
9.04 was fine.
this version madness confuses me. i could not get it to run on 9.10.
i had 9vx running fine in 9.10 on the same machine.
it was the upgrade to 10.04 LTS that messed it up today.
i wonder why the library allocation addresses are different.
The address shown by ldd can even vary from run to run, for the same file -
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2005-03/4363.html
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Charles Forsyth fors...@terzarima.netwrote:
this version madness confuses me. i could not get it to run on 9.10.
i had
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Vinu Rajashekhar vinuthe...@gmail.com wrote:
The address shown by ldd can even vary from run to run, for the same file -
yeah it's a feechur.
But still all my libs are living in high half of 32-bit space on a
running instance.
The two LOAD segments on my 9vx
17 matches
Mail list logo
