On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
>
> The only complaint I've had about walk was the expectation
> in the protocol that servers produce the list of Qids all
> the way down. That got in the way when experimenting
> with a server that used a hash table of full path names
>
On Mon, 4/1/19, Ethan Gardener wrote:
> I remember hearing of some disadvantage to
> walking directories, but can't remember what it was.
> Could someone remind me, please? Perhaps there was
> more than one, of course. Perhaps a performance trick
> couldn't be employed?
The only complaint
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 5:27 PM, hiro wrote:
> perhaps you mean that if you bind a lot you have to walk a lot :)
If that's the only issue, I'll be happy. :)
perhaps you mean that if you bind a lot you have to walk a lot :)
I remember hearing of some disadvantage to walking directories, but can't
remember what it was. Could someone remind me, please? Perhaps there was more
than one, of course. Perhaps a performance trick couldn't be employed?
