On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:06:57PM -0200, Iruatã Souza wrote:
> Never tried it, but you could try installing 9front, then your
> distribution of choice atop of that.
If nothing else works, I will fall back to a kernel loaded locally from
the sketched "by hand" plan9 partition (indeed the 9FAT at
> If I'm not mistaken, the man page about kfs is misleading. It says that
> indeed what is not fossil is treated as "kfs", but that "kfs" handles
> cd9660 or dos too.
>
> If I understand correctly, this is not true. This is 9660srv or dossrv
> or bzfl programs that are copied as "kfs" in the
Never tried it, but you could try installing 9front, then your
distribution of choice atop of that.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:06 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:26:39PM -0800, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> i'm not sure what the root cause of your problem is,
>
> I'm now
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 04:26:39PM -0800, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i'm not sure what the root cause of your problem is,
I'm now suspecting that the underlying problem is that a 9fat is a dos,
but that is a special dos: part of a plan9 slice, so whether kfs or
fossil supplementary partitions are
Hello,
As explained in a previous message, I try to install Plan9 on a new node
(previous one defunct).
I have tried the usb Bell Labs and 9 atom flavours, and none works on my
node.
The Bell Labs iso works (I mean it boots and the install starts) but
9pcflop doesn't recognize my disks (while
i'm not sure what the root cause of your problem is, due to not enough data,
but it does remind me of a limitation that has been bugging me.
to boot from usb cleanly, i added a bit to the boot process that creates a
loopback
sd device /dev/sdu0 that points to the usb disk device. i've been