Hi Kenji,
As Joseph said, shorthand for "Thanks for correcting me on that, and
giving me the knowledge I needed, or that I asked for..." It is
probably a Western-ism, a cultural thing of America/ United Kingdom/
Australia, if not others. I've been using it since I could talk, and
started asking th
On May 22, 2014 10:18:32 PM EDT, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
>> Ok, I stand corrected.
>
>Off topic, sorry.
>
>I saw this phrase some times here.
>What it does mean?
>
>I know it's meaning I think.
>What I want to know is why they say just 'thanks'.
>Is this something some culture related?
>
>
> Ok, I stand corrected.
Off topic, sorry.
I saw this phrase some times here.
What it does mean?
I know it's meaning I think.
What I want to know is why they say just 'thanks'.
Is this something some culture related?
Kenji
Just booted the VM using WLAN and my phones wireless hotspot, came up
almost instantly. Now the real work begins - configuration...
On 5/23/14, Shane Morris wrote:
> Ok, I stand corrected.
>
> On 5/23/14, s...@9front.org wrote:
>>> I was under the understanding Plan 9
>>> didn't work under VMWar
Ok, I stand corrected.
On 5/23/14, s...@9front.org wrote:
>> I was under the understanding Plan 9
>> didn't work under VMWare...
>
> http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/vmware/img/fusion.png
>
> sl
>
>
> I was under the understanding Plan 9
> didn't work under VMWare...
http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/vmware/img/fusion.png
sl
On Thu May 22 17:25:07 EDT 2014, edgecombe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Aram, if you have a bunch of settings that work under VMWare Fusion
> for Plan 9, then I am all ears. I was under the understanding Plan 9
> didn't work under VMWare...
the second thing the nix terminal ran on was vmware. i just hav
Aram, if you have a bunch of settings that work under VMWare Fusion
for Plan 9, then I am all ears. I was under the understanding Plan 9
didn't work under VMWare...
On 5/23/14, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
>
>>> Ah, ruby, yet another technology I hav
On May 22, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
>> Ah, ruby, yet another technology I have zero use for on my systems.
>
> That technology is already installed on your system.
And not used. Wasted bits on the ssd.
http://hadihariri.com/2014/04/21/build-make-no-more/
> Ah, ruby, yet another technology I have zero use for on my systems.
That technology is already installed on your system.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
On May 22, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Rubén Berenguel wrote:
>
>> From:
>> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/master/Library/Formula/qemu.rb
>
> Ah, ruby, yet another technology I have zero use for on my systems.
And the link returns:
It's homebrew, a package repository for OS X. OS X already comes with a
ruby interpreter anyway. And this allows anyone to compile from source qemu
2.0.0 without much fuss.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Rubén Berenguel
> wrote:
>
> From:
>
On May 22, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Rubén Berenguel wrote:
> From:
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/master/Library/Formula/qemu.rb
Ah, ruby, yet another technology I have zero use for on my systems.
-jas
➜ ~ brew info qemu
qemu: stable 2.0.0, HEAD
http://www.qemu.org/
/usr/local/Cellar/qemu/1.5.1 (114 files, 90M)
Built from source
/usr/local/Cellar/qemu/2.0.0_1 (120 files, 98M) *
Built from source
From:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/master/Library/Formula/qemu.rb
==> Dependenci
On May 22, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
> I have both 1.6.1 and 2.0 on 10.9 (the latest). 1.6.1 is not ancient
> and I didn't even need to compile it. Plan 9 runs just fine. 2.0 I
> compiled because I needed the new arm64 support. It wasn't hard.
What’s your Mac OS X build environme
> If by ‘works’ you mean the an ancient version that doesn’t really run
> well on OS X 10.9.x, then sure. So far, I’ve not gotten a version of
> qemu to build on OS X that would support Plan 9 or any other OS I’m
> interesting in testing.
I have both 1.6.1 and 2.0 on 10.9 (the latest). 1.6.1 is n
On May 22, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
>> because they're using osx, and don't want to shell out for vmware.
>
> QEMU works on OS X.
If by ‘works’ you mean the an ancient version that doesn’t really run
well on OS X 10.9.x, then sure. So far, I’ve not gotten a version of
qemu to
> because they're using osx, and don't want to shell out for vmware.
QEMU works on OS X.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
On Thu May 22 06:55:44 EDT 2014, ara...@mgk.ro wrote:
> Why do people insist on VirtualBox? How many times it has to be said.
> VirtualBox is utter shite. QEMU and VMware work. QEMU is especially
> interesting because it can work without a broken kernel driver
> (although it can use kvm, a good ker
Aram Hăvărneanu I don’t know who you are but you seem to be in a very bad mood
today.
From: Aram Hăvărneanu
Sent: Thursday, 22 May 2014 11:54
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Why do people insist on VirtualBox? How many times it has to be said.
VirtualBox is utter sh
Why do people insist on VirtualBox? How many times it has to be said.
VirtualBox is utter shite. QEMU and VMware work. QEMU is especially
interesting because it can work without a broken kernel driver
(although it can use kvm, a good kernel driver on Linux).
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
Hi Shane,
I just tried an installation from scratch of 9atom - downloaded the
ISO from Quanstro.net, installed on VirtualBox 4.3.12 on Mavericks
10.9.3 accepting the defaults as far as possible. It all installed
fine and booted fine. I've not had time to setup networking etc. but
it certainly doesn
Hi 9fans,
I am running the latest VirtualBox on the latest Mavericks, and after an
install of 9atom, go to run the resulting image, and execution stops at the
"/bin/rc" command, just before entry into Rio.
I noticed this same problem on my Macbook Air on 10.8 - I thought I had
just botched my pre
23 matches
Mail list logo
