I have rebuilt equis with the change in ape's select
and it seems to work fine (tested with xlock and xterm only).
this was not quite straightforward due to changes in ape, and
the compiler becomming a little stricter.
On this subject, what is the general feeling on integer
type'ed functions whic
ANSI C has a "_Noreturn" attribute that I started to implement,
but I think I might fall back to a #pragma, which would be quicker to do.
On 28 February 2013 14:15, Steve Simon wrote:
> I have rebuilt equis with the change in ape's select
> and it seems to work fine (tested with xlock and xter
On Thursday 28 of February 2013 14:21:08 Charles Forsyth wrote:
> ANSI C has a "_Noreturn" attribute that I started to implement,
> but I think I might fall back to a #pragma, which would be quicker to do.
another quick hack:
#define exit(status) do { exit(status); return 0; } while (0)
with do{
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, dexen deVries wrote:
> #define exit(status) do { exit(status); return 0; } while (0)
What does kenc do with a void function attempting to return 0?
—Joel
> What does kenc do with a void function attempting to return 0?
t.c:6 incompatible types: "VOID" and "INT" for op "RETURN"
-Steve
thanks steve
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Steve Simon wrote:
>> What does kenc do with a void function attempting to return 0?
>
> t.c:6 incompatible types: "VOID" and "INT" for op "RETURN"
>
> -Steve
>
--
Federico G. Benavento
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, dexen deVries
> wrote:
> > #define exit(status) do { exit(status); return 0; } while (0)
> What does kenc do with a void function attempting to return 0?
incompatible types: "VOID" and "INT" for op "RE
Is there a way to increase the cursor size when using a 4k screen under x11?
Mark.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T5b64fb7ca310358c-Mca97229da8793e9e4521ba67
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subs
I've submitted a patch, ape-select, that just removes the
offending EBADF. If there's a desire to up the FD_SETSIZE
to 1024 like everyone else, we should address that as a
separate patch and modernize the in the
process.
-jas
On 28 February 2013 23:02, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> that just removes the
> offending EBADF
>
it should generate EBADF for any bit set in any of the fd_sets when that
bit doesn't correspond to an open file descriptor.
the mistake was producing EBADF on a very specific condition associated
with an *o
10 matches
Mail list logo