Re: [9fans] bug? test f -older t

2013-10-01 Thread arisawa
I looked the latest 9front source and found test.c have been already fixed. thank you. On 2013/10/01, at 20:53, erik quanstrom wrote: > On Tue Oct 1 07:35:11 EDT 2013, aris...@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Am I missing something? >> It seems logic is inverted to me. >> >> Kenji Ar

Re: [9fans] bug? test f -older t

2013-10-01 Thread erik quanstrom
On Tue Oct 1 07:35:11 EDT 2013, aris...@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp wrote: > Hello, > > Am I missing something? > It seems logic is inverted to me. > > Kenji Arisawa > > maia% ls -l > ... > --rw-rw-r-- M 323 arisawa arisawa 0 Sep 29 06:29 x > --rw-rw-r-- M 323 arisawa arisawa14 Sep 28 17:5

Re: [9fans] bug? test f -older t

2013-10-01 Thread arisawa
I have forgotten that I took up this bug in Jun this year. Already fixed in distribution? On 2013/10/01, at 20:34, arisawa wrote: > Hello, > > Am I missing something? > It seems logic is inverted to me. > > Kenji Arisawa > > maia% ls -l > ... > --rw-rw-r-- M 323 arisawa arisawa 0 Sep

[9fans] bug? test f -older t

2013-10-01 Thread arisawa
Hello, Am I missing something? It seems logic is inverted to me. Kenji Arisawa maia% ls -l ... --rw-rw-r-- M 323 arisawa arisawa 0 Sep 29 06:29 x --rw-rw-r-- M 323 arisawa arisawa14 Sep 28 17:50 z maia% mtime x 1380403777 x maia% if(test z -older 1380403777) echo older maia% if(