On Thu Jun 18 03:43:58 PDT 2015, 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone looked at this, or have a version which performs both of these
features?
So, I think you'll be happy with https://github.com/0intro/drawterm now.
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
- erik
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
Because the original repository is hosted on Bitbucket (and Google Code),
and Russ won't accept to review changes on Rietveld anymore.
So, I've simply moved it to GitHub.
--
David du Colombier
On Jun 18, 2015, at 7:47 AM, David du Colombier 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
Because the original repository is hosted on Bitbucket (and Google Code),
and Russ won't accept to review changes on Rietveld anymore.
For the same
Quoting erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net:
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
because DVCS programs have solved all the problems preventing people
from forking software for a single patch, then abandoning it forever
khm
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
Because we can, unfortunately. You have to sell the value of
coordination to a bunch of primadonnas, whose singularly valuable
talent is to break the rules (or at least to swim against the stream).
No use raging against this, it is
So, I've simply moved it to GitHub.
The voice of sanity!
Lucio.
PS: you should probably have made an announcement here, rather than
have Erik extract one from you, but then so should Russ have warned us
all, etc., back to the Big Bang. C'est la vie.
Does that mean you will be reviewing, responding and accepting changes?
ian
Quoting lu...@proxima.alt.za:
talent is to break the rules (or at least to swim against the stream).
What rules? What stream?
Are there even enough plan 9 users on earth to generate a stream with
a current strong enough to swim against?
khm
so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm?
because nobody reads their mail ever. perhaps one of you guys can put
this in though?
i think it's good that someone who can't test his code changes doesn't
commit to the main repo without giving disclaimers.
In my experience
Are there even enough plan 9 users on earth to generate a stream with
a current strong enough to swim against?
Awww, there are enough of us to make a conga surely...
-Steve
apparently just enough for a stream of bullsh*t at every opportunity.
Are there even enough plan 9 users on earth to generate a stream with
a current strong enough to swim against?
fwiw
https://bitbucket.org/jas/drawterm-cocoa
probably has seen the most day to day use since it's what most of coraid used.
ian
On second thought I probably should have just said it has had much use for this
reason.
ian
This version does populate /mnt/term with c: which the one on swtch.com does
not,
I believe this is because of an old but that caused ls /mnt/term to crash
drawterm.
Since my repository is pretty recent, there shouldn't be any difference with
Russ' repository (except the following bug fix).
Anyone looked at this, or have a version which performs both of these
features?
So, I think you'll be happy with https://github.com/0intro/drawterm now.
--
David du Colombier
https://github.com/0intro/drawterm
This version does populate /mnt/term with c: which the one on swtch.com does
not,
I believe this is because of an old but that caused ls /mnt/term to crash
drawterm.
However it doe snot seem to handle cut and paste between windows and plan9
any more.
Anyone
Where is the one true source of drawterm for windows?
/sys/src/cmd/unix/drawterm ? swtch.com? elsewhere?
-Steve
https://github.com/0intro/drawterm
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Steve Simon st...@quintile.net wrote:
Where is the one true source of drawterm for windows?
/sys/src/cmd/unix/drawterm ? swtch.com? elsewhere?
-Steve
18 matches
Mail list logo
