> Back to my original question: what currently uses the ipv6= tag? We
> need to update the man pages at least.
ndb/dnsquery. ndb/dnsdebug. it's inconsistent.
- erik
> It's still undecided how to best cope with a mixed v4 and v6
> world. I don't expect the ipv6 attribute to go away.
I like the new (to me, anyway) ip= behaviour. parseip() and isv4()
provide everything that's needed at the C level to distinguish the
two. ndb/dns already does this right thing
It's still undecided how to best cope with a mixed v4 and v6
world. I don't expect the ipv6 attribute to go away.
While we're talking about ndb ... what's the status of the ipv6= tag?
Last week I was setting up IPv6 on a network and was adding
ipv6=2001:... entries in ndb as per the manpages. I lost the better
part of a day trying to figure out why the records weren't being
propagated to the DNS slaves
