> Nice. Excited to see how a cleaned up + simplified runproc() and the
> per-Mach queues could also change things. Any reason why the ping test
> w/ monmwait wasn't consistent with the performance improvement in
> other areas?
yes there is. in a later post i describe it, but basically what i saw
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:14 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> so, i've done a little bit more work characterizing the performance
> of the scheduler correctness changes, and i know have some understanding
> on why e.g. ping times are a bit slower.
>
> the old code essentially let processor 0 spin in ru
so, i've done a little bit more work characterizing the performance
of the scheduler correctness changes, and i know have some understanding
on why e.g. ping times are a bit slower.
the old code essentially let processor 0 spin in runproc, other processors
called
halt. the new code uses monmwait
