[9fans] rpi emmc

2016-01-02 Thread erik quanstrom
in diffing bls' version and sources, i see some significant differences, but it's not clear which one is more up-to-date. anyone? - erik ; 9diff emmc.c /n/sources/plan9/sys/src/9/bcm/emmc.c:178,184 - emmc.c:178,188 static int datadone(void*) { - return emmc.datadone; +

Re: [9fans] rpi emmc

2016-01-02 Thread David du Colombier
> in diffing bls' version and sources, i see some significant > differences, but it's not clear which one is more up-to-date. Brian Stuart's version is more up-to-date. Brian Stuart based his changes on the latest changes from Richard Miller, available in /n/sources/contrib/miller/9/bcm. term%

Re: [9fans] rpi emmc

2016-01-02 Thread Brian L. Stuart
On Sat, 1/2/16, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > in diffing bls' version and sources, i see some significant > > differences, but it's not clear which one is more up-to-date. > > Brian Stuart's version is more up-to-date. > > Brian Stuart based his changes on the latest changes

Re: [9fans] rpi emmc

2016-01-02 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sat Jan 2 21:23:12 PST 2016, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote: > On Sat, 1/2/16, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > in diffing bls' version and sources, i see some significant > > > differences, but it's not clear which one is more up-to-date. > > > > Brian Stuart's version is

Re: [9fans] rpi emmc

2016-01-02 Thread David du Colombier
> I'm pretty sure that file is unchanged from Richard's latest version > on contrib. Yes, it is unchanged. -- David du Colombier