On Mon Jan 4 16:23:56 EST 2010, st...@quintile.net wrote:
> > (in the odd ddmmy format it used)
>
> We, on this side of the pond, find that format rather modern and exciting;
> not in the least bit old... ☺
i suppose that it has the benefit that it conflicts
with the fileserver's dump format
> (in the odd ddmmy format it used)
We, on this side of the pond, find that format rather modern and exciting;
not in the least bit old... ☺
i submitted a patch to secuser. i noticed that the
month printed was off by one. according to secuser
one year from today would be (in the odd ddmmy
format it used) 04002011.
i changed that to mmdd and fixed a handful of
bugs. one year from today is now 20110104.
- erik
