On Nov 10, 2008, at 3:27 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
At least in case of cpu(1) the magic is a bit perverse and quite
unlike the rest of the system. The way notes are managed make
a local end of a cpu(1) jump through considerable hoops in order
for the notes to be properly delivered. That was a
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 01:55 +0900, sqweek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Roman V. Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The only question is -- where such a note
is supposed to be sent to?
Can someone, please, educate me on the moral equivalent of process
groups, sessions and
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least in case of cpu(1) the magic is a bit perverse and quite
unlike the rest of the system. The way notes are managed make
a local end of a cpu(1) jump through considerable hoops in order
for the notes to be
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:49 -0800, ron minnich wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At least in case of cpu(1) the magic is a bit perverse and quite
unlike the rest of the system. The way notes are managed make
a local end of a cpu(1) jump
cpu is just great tutorial.
notes forwarder, well, I am stil unsure.
ron
At least in case of cpu(1) the magic is a bit perverse and quite
unlike the rest of the system. The way notes are managed make
a local end of a cpu(1) jump through considerable hoops in order
for the notes to be properly delivered. That was a sad discovery.
Another discovery was that
... would you really honestly say that rolling out your
own notes forwarder is a *neat* trick? As opposed to
be able to use basic system's FS functionality?
ok, how would you implement it, then? how would you deliver a note to
a process that's running on a remote machine? would you be
I would like to be able to import the /proc (or similar) filesystem from
the remote machine and bind it over the files that my local kernel uses
to send notes to the proxy process. That's how my ideal world model
would work. Observe how that was also the first suggestion on the notes
thief
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Roman V. Shaposhnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only question is -- where such a note
is supposed to be sent to?
Can someone, please, educate me on the moral equivalent of process
groups, sessions and their relationships with #c/cons ?
Maybe you worked this
I'm not really sure what magic is involved in the DEL interrupt.
rio (or ip/telnetd, or ... some other user program).
Last night I downloaded 9vx. It works fine from a terminal, using
the following invocation:
../9vx.Linux -g -u glenda
where -g is the option to run sans GUI.
This has one or two complications. There is no way to interrupt or kill
the foreground process. Instead, ctrl-c interrupts 9vx itself.
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK there is
no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with some magic
combination of the keys ctrl-t ctrl-t X.
gabi
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I downloaded 9vx. It works fine from a
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081022 11:16]:
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK there
is no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with some magic
combination of the keys ctrl-t ctrl-t X.
Why not write a simple 'shell'
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081022 11:16]:
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK there
is no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with some magic
combination of the keys ctrl-t ctrl-t X.
Why not write a simple
* erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081022 13:51]:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081022 11:16]:
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK
there is no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with
some magic combination of
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:42 PM, erik quanstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you mean like, uh, rio or acme? ☺
i can't see why it would be a bad idea to do something like
this for text-only mode. it'd be a nice exercise, if nothing else.
it should be possible to do without writing a file server,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081022 11:16]:
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK
there is no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with
some magic combination of the keys ctrl-t ctrl-t X.
Why not write a simple
Hello,
Rio is the responsible for killing a process using the Del key, AFAIK
there is no way to terminate a program running in console. May be with
some magic combination of the keys ctrl-t ctrl-t X.
Why not write a simple 'shell' shell (heh) that cooks input and just runs
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 12:28 -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
rio does provide most everything one would need for a text-mode
interface. unfortunately, you can't currently tail -f /dev/text. perhaps
such a change would be easier and more general
That's a very good point! It hadn't occurred to me
This has one or two complications. There is no way to interrupt or kill
the foreground process. Instead, ctrl-c interrupts 9vx itself.
chris,
one of the nice things about the Plan 9 graphics system is that rio is
in no way different than any other graphical program. it reads and
writes files
I was playing around with the modified win program and I realized
it's not going to work due to the propensity of acme to redirect
standard error to a separate window. This environment has no way of
notifying anyone that a new window has opened without being requested
except visually.
A better
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:54 -0600, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
This has one or two complications. There is no way to interrupt or kill
the foreground process. Instead, ctrl-c interrupts 9vx itself.
chris,
one of the nice things about the Plan 9 graphics system is that rio is
in no way
22 matches
Mail list logo
