On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Charles Forsyth
wrote:
>
> On 9 May 2014 21:37, ron minnich wrote:
>>
>> under the Inferno license for that matter
>
>
> that's usually MIT
Yeah. Either 3 clause BSD or MIT work. Many others don't. So whichever
one of those floats your boat, those of you have auth
On 9 May 2014 21:37, ron minnich wrote:
> under the Inferno license for that matter
that's usually MIT
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Full plan9 *native* build of the kernel, libs and bin on a
> /RapsberryPi/ is about 4 minutes
GOOD. Why not have a web page? The great plan 9 build shootout. Nobody
would be happier than me if Linux always lost.
ron
On Fri, 09 May 2014 13:37:04 PDT ron minnich wrote:
> somebody referred me to the discussion.
>
> Sometimes we found people wanted to build on their existing OS (Linux,
> OSX, whatever) in a cross-build way, and, further, didn't want to do
> that in a VM, because they had tools they liked.
>
> g
actually, on this machine, about half the interrupt
sources don't do msi, since msi is the default irq type:
; grep ioapic /dev/irqalloc
#vec.mach irq count cycles typename
65.0 159967793975781 ioapic i8042
65.7 9
> Also, from the Akaros side, we've extended the Plan 9 MSI code to
> support MSI-X and tested it on real hardware; works fine. This allowed
> us to stop worrying about ACPI; you don't need it if you do MSI-X.
> Relief! And MSI-X is in some ways easier than MSI.
i don't see how this could be the c
somebody referred me to the discussion.
Sometimes we found people wanted to build on their existing OS (Linux,
OSX, whatever) in a cross-build way, and, further, didn't want to do
that in a VM, because they had tools they liked.
github.com/rminnich/NxM is the last snapshot of the Sandia/BL fork,
