If the code is good, I could always use another wiki. Have him post
the code here.
--
Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
I've been wondering if the techniques that colinux uses to run Linux
inside windows could also be used to make Xen in Windows possible.
I'm sure you could take the xen dom0<->domU interface and use
it to allow domU's to be run on top of win32 (or the NT kernel, or
any other kernel, for that matt
acid: lstk()
:2: (error) no stack frame
I used rdbfs often when working with sparc, but over tcp (minor
mods to rdbfs to not set baud, and then a small shim to invoke
it on an fd from dial()) since the computer was connected to
the serial port of a non-plan9 computer.
As for the stack frame --
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:48:56 -0400 Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you can run xen inside Windows. Xen is always in control of
> the hardware, it can let some of the domains to access some of it directly,
> but the MMU and the interrupts are always handled by Xen.
I've
| that's really unlikely given that the kernel is splhi
| looping to poll the uart.
A while back there was a bug where hardware flow control wasn't turned
on, so characters would get dropped. Is that in good working order now?
HAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA.
-Devon
This was too good not to share.
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:47 -0700
Subject: Re:Plan 9
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recently visited plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9 and
I would like to offer my web design services. I
term% acid -k 1000
/386/9pc:386 plan 9 boot image
/sys/lib/acid/port
/sys/lib/acid/386
acid: lstk()
:2: (error) no stack frame
acid:
>> i seem to have it working somewhat now. i'm just not sure how much i
>> can do with it. it doesn't seem to have a stack to backtrace. does
>> anyone use thi
> i seem to have it working somewhat now. i'm just not sure how much i
> can do with it. it doesn't seem to have a stack to backtrace. does
> anyone use this rdb?
i used to use it all the time. i expect it should still work.
perhaps you're not invoking acid with -k?
russ
I beleive the uarts still default to FIFOs disabled.
I use rs422 on plan9 (on a 1.6Ghz machine) at 115Kbaud reliably -
as long as the fifo is enabled (the manpage is a bit out of date,
though the source isn't). Having said this I _do_ have trouble at 115K
on my 400Mhz laptop, which is sad as it co
i seem to have it working somewhat now. i'm just not sure how much i
can do with it. it doesn't seem to have a stack to backtrace. does
anyone use this rdb?
regarding serial ports, back in 1982 i wrote my first device driver
for a serial port. it was a Signetics something. we connected two of
>> could it be that some other process is stealing bytes
>> out of the uart? how do i make sure that's not happening?
>
> that's really unlikely given that the kernel is splhi
> looping to poll the uart.
I don't think another process is stealing bytes but I do sympathize
with anybody having uart
> could it be that some other process is stealing bytes
> out of the uart? how do i make sure that's not happening?
that's really unlikely given that the kernel is splhi
looping to poll the uart.
russ
could it be that some other process is stealing bytes
out of the uart? how do i make sure that's not happening?
bc
> Used leak(1) in anger for the first time,
> major kudos to its author.
Our resident genius Russ.
Leak: can't live without it.
Used leak(1) in anger for the first time,
major kudos to its author.
-Steve
It doesn't look like the kernel is managing to read the
serial input correctly. Maybe it's coming in too fast?
Russ
> run rdbfs with -d and maybe the output will be more illuminating.
>
> russ
term% rdbfs -d -p 1000 /mnt/consoles/bertha
attach /mnt/consoles/bertha
term% db -k /386/9satabwctst 1000
got Tread tag 29 fid 347 offset 48 count 4: here goes...r0030...serial
[+bwc, bwc, sah, sah]
unknown message
s
run rdbfs with -d and maybe the output will be more illuminating.
russ
I'm having trouble getting rdbfs to work. I start the rdbfs as follows:
term% rdbfs -p 1000 /mnt/consoles/bertha
(I've imported the console to bertha from the console server.)
I then run db
db -k /386/9satabwctst 1000
which sends the following out the serial line
R00
What, you don't like Hungarian notation, multiple calling methods,
bizzare & inconsitent function names and overly bloated libraries?
Sheesh, what do you think this is {Plan9 | Unix | OpenVMS}?
On 8/24/05, Francisco Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> seems that we should probably switch to l
apologies for not being there. I tried but couldent. Somehow, people
here in spain think that chats are evil and I couldn´t convince them to
let me use it. I´m now back in town, so I hope there´ll be no problem to
join the next one.
On 8/15/05, Uriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When: August 15th,
seems that we should probably switch to linux VMs as well.
At least, we wont have to program with damn ms apis.
On 8/23/05, Gorka guardiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And windows.
>
> On 8/23/05, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> > I should probably mention here that once the VT and Pacifica become
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I cant use "kfscmd"(eg. "disk/kfscmd allow") ,it showed cant open
>commands file (that's "/srv/kfs.cmd" maybe ,but i havnt this file ) . i
>think i may miss some configs of the kfs, then what can i do to solve
>it?
Chances are you have installed using the fossil filesyst
24 matches
Mail list logo
