hola,
I think nemo's intro is what you're looking for:
http://plan9.escet.urjc.es/who/nemo/9.intro.pdf
On 2/23/07, Keith Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've been interested in plan 9 for a while now & I've recently installed
it on my MacBook Pro (under Parallels) and I've been digging a
not to mention, lots 'o stuff under the 'Documentation' section in the
following web page:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/
enjoy!
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:26:49 -0500, Keith Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been interested in plan 9 for a while now & I've recently installed
> i
for C, check out the follwoing web page:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/comp.html
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:26:49 -0500, Keith Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been interested in plan 9 for a while now & I've recently installed
> it on my MacBook Pro (under Parallels) and I've be
Hi,
I've been interested in plan 9 for a while now & I've recently installed
it on my MacBook Pro (under Parallels) and I've been digging around in
it (setting up networking, getting used to acme, etc), but now I want to
look into developing programs. Are there any good starting points for th
Lex has three benefits:
1) You don't have to write the lexer directly.
2) What you do have to write is fairly concise.
3) The resulting lexer is fairly efficient.
It has two main drawbacks:
4) The input model does not always match your
own program's input model, creating a messy interface.
5) O
On 2/23/07, William K. Josephson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:27:56AM -0500, Joel Salomon wrote:
> Would such a project be a worthwhile spent of time? (Might it develop
> into the asteroid to kill the dinosaur waiting for it?)
Why go to the trouble? For C, the lexer is
i don't think that sort of absolutist thinking really works.
i used gnu grep (and all the other gnu tools) on utf-8 stuff
from the time of the first sam release for unix till i stopped using
linux for much development. i never had a problem with
g(ed|sed|awk|e?grep) tripping on utf-8 when the lo
If it doesn't for one case, then it doesn't.
On 2/23/07, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
; egrep '[αβ]0' fu
; egrep '^.0' fu
--
- curiosity sKilled the cat
utf-8 encoding will "just work" (unless the gnu folk are
rearranging characters with the bucky bit set) or if
the result depends on knowing the width of a character,
e.g. in
a) a character class
b) matching a single character with ".".
for example for a file "fu" with these lines
Hello 9fans,
Pegasus 2.4 is released.
The source codes are in
http://plan9.aichi-u..jp/netlib
The document is in
http://plan9.aichi-u.ac.jp/pegasus
Now, Pegasus 2.4 supports WebDAV.
Tested WebDAV clients are:
Mac/OSX
WinXP
Win2000
Enjoy.
Kenji Arisawa
Also, I am not sure if you can use expressions with big unicode
characteres in Unix, last time I looked with sed, you could not.
On 2/23/07, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many unix programs don't use ``extended'' regular expressions by
> default. See regexp(7) on Plan 9 or try egrep/gre
Hi,
A user of a program of mine (http://www.vanheusden.com/multitail/) tries to
use plan9 regexps under linux and doesn't succeed.
Am I right that plan9 regular expressions are not compatible with the ones
of "regular" unix?
--
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
