Re: [9fans] Alpha bootloader "kernel stack not valid"

2006-02-23 Thread cblack1
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:40:51AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Unless you've modified ether82557.c, that should read > > ether0=type=i82557 Oh, right. That's what I had, but for some reason I thought it didn't look right and changed it. > > I am getting a bunch of machine checks for

Re: [9fans] Alpha bootloader "kernel stack not valid"

2006-02-23 Thread cblack1
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:15:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd start by replacing the 82559 with a 2114x. Mine is a DE-500 but > you might be able to find Netgear FA310s (not 311s), which should work > too. Alright, I'll see if I can scrounge one of those. > What's in your /alpha/conf

Re: [9fans] Alpha bootloader "kernel stack not valid"

2006-02-22 Thread cblack1
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 10:57:10PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There are several memmoves in that vicinity; could you show us the > line and some surrounding context? Sure. From /sys/src/boot/alphapc/bootp.c, in bootp(), near the bottom: addr = (uchar*)entry; p = tftpb.data+

[9fans] Alpha bootloader "kernel stack not valid"

2006-02-22 Thread cblack1
I have an AlphaPC 164LX that I've decided to try Plan 9 on, but I've hit a roadblock in my efforts. I've successfully compiled the binaries, kernel, and bootloader on another machine, and found a network card that works with the SRM bootp/tftp bootloader (Intel 82559, oddly enough). Bootp works gre