On Dec 29, 2006, at 7:13 PM, ron minnich wrote:
People are beginning to realize just how much XML sucks as a universal
description language. Too late in some cases, but we can hope.
I could use all the soap at work to clean up this mess ...
On 12/29/06, Martin Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Colinux is the first project I know of that has abandoned XML
config files because they were too unreadable and difficult
for users to maintain.
yes, but earlier, ganglia dumped xml in favor of s-expressions. Also,
a little birdie in xensour
Colinux is the first project I know of that has abandoned XML
config files because they were too unreadable and difficult
for users to maintain.
[They've gone back to just putting the command-line options
into a file! Not necessarily the best approach, but better than...]
Let's hope they are the
Hi Charles, I am new to limbo programming. Can you please give some
small sample program for exception handling to understand the concept.
Expecting reply,
Ken
On 12/21/06, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
once bsd unix used
9fs stream tcp nowait root /bin/9/u9f
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Gorka guardiola wrote:
Thanks god XML made it so much more readable and
easy to write now. I was deeply scared by the one line
lack of structure :-).
launchd just proves that Microsoft has indeed infiltrated the Darwin
development team; it's the first step along the road
>You can enable xinetd in launchd and do it the old way if you choose.
>At least that used to be the case.
that's what it did on my powerpc system when i upgraded it to 10.4,
but on the newer x86 one i wanted to fit in with any newer scheme(s),
and not change things like that.
You can enable xinetd in launchd and do it the old way if you choose.
At least that used to be the case.
On 12/20/06, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
once bsd unix used
9fs stream tcp nowait root /bin/9/u9fs u9fs
and xinetd made it a little bit more elaborate,
b
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:11:39AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > the GNU folks are progressively cramming as much of the system as they
> > can into bash. eventually, we're only going to have two programs.
> > bringing the two together is the Grand Unified Theory of modern unix.
>
> i wonder if
I'm not sure whether this one is better:
http://perllinux.sourceforge.net/
Greetings
Denis
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:25:47 -0200
"Rodrigo Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They do try...
>
> http://www.informatimago.com/linux/emacs-on-user-mode-linux.html
>
> []'s
>
> Rodrigo
>
> On 12/
So, that 9pfs.plist is in the above directory, I rebooted and it don't
see a tcp port 564 open in listen mode. What mode does the plist file need?
Anything else needed? Log message anywhere?
They do try...
http://www.informatimago.com/linux/emacs-on-user-mode-linux.html
[]'s
Rodrigo
On 12/21/06, Anthony Sorace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/21/06, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
> > (because they all start programs!)
>
i wonder if they will be more successful than the physics guys?
- erik
On Thu Dec 21 10:06:41 EST 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
> > > (because they all start programs!)
> >
> > too bad th
* ron minnich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> of course , the gmail ads show this:
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/07/10/kip.html
>
> at which point my brain starts to hurt.
No wonder. The first paragraph states ``This month we will continue in that
vein''. 'Nuff said.
Martin
On 12/21/06, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
> (because they all start programs!)
too bad they forgot sh!
the GNU folks are progressively cramming as much of the system as they
can into bash. eventually, we're only going to have two pro
On 12/21/06, Gorka guardiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks god XML made it so much more readable and
easy to write now. I was deeply scared by the one line
lack of structure :-).
it was interesting to watch 300 bytes of xen config turn into 3000
bytes of unreadable xml.
"XML happens"
of c
but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
(because they all start programs!)
too bad they forgot sh!
russ
On 12/21/06, Brantley Coile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where do I put the stuff below?
note the subject line. launchd will scan /Library/LaunchAgents and
/System/Library/LaunchAgents (i think also some other places?
LaunchDaemons, or some such?). user-added ones go in
/Library/LaunchAgents.
> but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
> (because they all start programs!) so in that dialect we must now say
I wonder why the didn't require the small amount of real
information in the file to be rot13'ed. ☺
I can almost read this version.
Great timing! I just changed to a new Mac and was looking
for a way to do this. I wound up sticking /usr/sbin/xinetd into rc.local.
Where do I put the stuff below?
> once bsd unix used
> 9fs stream tcp nowait root /bin/9/u9fs u9fs
>
> and xinetd made it a little bit more el
Thanks god XML made it so much more readable and
easy to write now. I was deeply scared by the one line
lack of structure :-).
On 12/21/06, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
once bsd unix used
9fs stream tcp nowait root /bin/9/u9fs u9fs
and xinetd made it a little
once bsd unix used
9fs stream tcp nowait root /bin/9/u9fs u9fs
and xinetd made it a little bit more elaborate,
but apple decided to combine init, x?inetd and cron
(because they all start programs!) so in that dialect we must now say
http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.
21 matches
Mail list logo
