Yes. Now it does sense to me.
Thank you! :-)
Antonin
On 9/26/07, Martin Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Antonin Vecera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > In my home profile is "bind -a $home/bin/rc /bin" .
> > Why is not in my namespace line "bind -a /bin /bin" ?
> > What is different between
* Antonin Vecera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> In my home profile is "bind -a $home/bin/rc /bin" .
> Why is not in my namespace line "bind -a /bin /bin" ?
> What is different between
> bind -a $home/bin/rc /bin
> and
> bind -a $home/man/4 /sys/man/4 ?
>
> Antonin
Essentially because bef
On 9/26/07, Gorka Guardiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Antonin Vecera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why 1 bind command adds 2! lines with bind command to my namespace?
> > Why is added "bind /sys/man/4 /sys/man/4" to namespace?
> > Why is one dir mounted to itself?
> >
>
> say you ru
On 9/26/07, Antonin Vecera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why 1 bind command adds 2! lines with bind command to my namespace?
> Why is added "bind /sys/man/4 /sys/man/4" to namespace?
> Why is one dir mounted to itself?
>
say you run:
bind -a /bla /tiki
This means "add an entry in the table under
On 9/26/07, Gorka Guardiola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you do a bind -a or a bind -b you have a union mount. That means
> means "add something to what there already is there", be it before or
> after. You need an entry
Till now it's clear.
> for what there is already there so it gets resol
When you do a bind -a or a bind -b you have a union mount. That means
means "add something to what there already is there", be it before or
after. You need an entry
for what there is already there so it gets resolved. That are the
extra lines you are looking at.
--
- curiosity sKilled the cat
Hi all,
can somebody help me to understand to bind and namespace ?
I made dir for manual pages in my $home and I wanted to bind it to /sys/man .
I typed:
1. term% bind -a $home/man/4 /sys/man/4
2. term% ns
3. bind /sys/man/4 /sys/man/4
4. bind -a /usr/antonin/man/4 /sys/
