On 8/18/05, Nigel Roles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C H Forsyth wrote:
> >i thought the more important thing would be
> >what might happen to the espresso machine.
> >
> Yes, a magnificent beast. I guess the best approach would be to make
> a key component of a proposed wireless infrastructure in
On 8/18/05, Nigel Roles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C H Forsyth wrote:
>
> >>>I don't anticipate any change to the sources and web infrastructure.
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >i thought the more important thing would be
> >what might happen to the espresso machine.
> >
> >
> >
> Yes, a magnificent beast. I
>>>I don't anticipate any change to the sources and web infrastructure.
>
> i thought the more important thing would be
> what might happen to the espresso machine.
Don't worry about that. We will hang on to that if it's the last thing we do.
Sape
C H Forsyth wrote:
I don't anticipate any change to the sources and web infrastructure.
i thought the more important thing would be
what might happen to the espresso machine.
Yes, a magnificent beast. I guess the best approach would be to make
a key component of a proposed wireless
>>I don't anticipate any change to the sources and web infrastructure.
i thought the more important thing would be
what might happen to the espresso machine.
> Does this have any impact on Jim and Russ?
> Will this affect the sources and web infrastructure at all
Sape already answered this, but let me just confirm.
Jim and Russ (as consultant) continue to have a welcome home in Bell Labs in a
new "Computing Systems Research" department that I will lea
>> Ken Thompson retired to California.
>
> he is still listed at www.entrisphere.com, so perhaps he still
> writes the odd line of code
brucee was kind enough to share some of his memories of
the labs and of Ken. I understand when the man says something,
every word is a pearl.
> Ken Thompson retired to California.
he is still listed at www.entrisphere.com, so perhaps he still
writes the odd line of code
>> http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=9846/ur0508l/ur0508l.html
>
> Does this have any impact on Jim and Russ?
> Will this affect the sources and web infrastructure at all?
No.
On 8/17/05, Sape Mullender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That was not a very nice thing to say. There are some fairly capable
> people left at Lucent although they may not be working on general
> purpose operating systems. There still is a lot of fun working on
> other systems issues — wireless,
> and the article itself:
>
> http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=9846/ur0508l/ur0508l.html
>
> text:
>
> Dept. 1127: going, Going, GONE! by Peter H. Salus
>
> In 1969, UNIX was created at Bell Labs.
>
> For decades, the source of the AT&T dialect of UNIX came from the
> researches of work
http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=9846/ur0508l/ur0508l.html
Does this have any impact on Jim and Russ?
Will this affect the sources and web infrastructure at all?
Tim Newsham
http://www.lava.net/~newsham/
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/16/2225215
Peter Salus over at UnixReview.com is reporting that AT&T Department 1127,
responsible for creating and maintaining Unix, has been officially disbanded.
The article provides an interesting "where are they now?" list of the original
authors
13 matches
Mail list logo
