Henrik Norbeck wrote:
>What does the standards committee say about BarFly m: macros?
>Besides, there are the U: and u: redefinitions. I'm getting to these
>parts in my implementation, and I will need to know what we
>accept as standard, since U:, u: and m: seem to be in conflict with
>each other
Jack Campin wrote:
> One piece of file-context-dependence that I am likely to introduce on my
> site fairly soon is BarFly macros.
> I believe some of the Windows implementors may be thinking
> about supporting them (Henrik? Laurie?)
Yes, it's on the list for AbcMus 2.0 (due out at the beginnin
Just updated the "BarFly macros" section of Musica Viva at:
http://www.musicaviva.com/abc/barfly/index.tpl
The title is a bit misleading, since its as much - perhaps more about
stress programs than macros, but oh well.
Musica Viva BarFly Macros includes a list of ornament macros I've found
usefu
