Re: [abcusers] Cattle

2003-07-31 Thread John Chambers
Christian M. Cepel writes: | | Just go with taxonomic nomenclature. | | Call it a bovine. :) | | Or walking hamburger or extra rare T-bone. :) My wife likes to tell people about the calf they had when she was little, which they named "Delicious". When the calf was eventually made into dinne

Re: [abcusers] Cattle

2003-07-31 Thread Christian M. Cepel
Just go with taxonomic nomenclature. Call it a bovine. :) Or walking hamburger or extra rare T-bone. :) John Chambers wrote: Phil Taylor writes: | John Chambers wrote: | | >(One textbook example for English is the lack of any word that is the | >singular form of "cattle". Other language

Re: [abcusers] Cattle

2003-07-29 Thread Tom Keays
on 7/29/03 11:03 AM, Phil Taylor wrote: > The singular of "cattle" is "cow". [...] I referred to > "bull semen" at one point and my supervisor (himself a world expert > in the field of Reproductive Biology) wanted it changed to "cow semen". I saw a man milk a bull, fie, man, fie. I saw a man mil

Re: [abcusers] Cattle

2003-07-29 Thread John Chambers
Phil Taylor writes: | John Chambers wrote: | | >(One textbook example for English is the lack of any word that is the | >singular form of "cattle". Other languages have such words, and they | >can't be translated to English with a single word. But you aren't | >going to fix the English langua

[abcusers] Cattle

2003-07-29 Thread Phil Taylor
John Chambers wrote: >(One textbook example for English is the lack of any word that is the >singular form of "cattle". Other languages have such words, and they >can't be translated to English with a single word. But you aren't >going to fix the English language; all you can do is chuckle a