Re: [abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-26 Thread Phil Taylor
Gianni Cunich wrote: The correct way to abuse the P: field, I dare say, is to use it in the body of a tune followed by blanks... no need to use ! or ;, or anythung else to force a line break, that's the natural line break character as far as abc native software are concerned! Why the hell a P:

Re: [abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-26 Thread Bert Van Vreckem
Phil Taylor wrote: The P: field doesn't produce a line break in BarFly. You can have a P: field in the middle of a line (the label goes on the next bar line). Ha, there's something I hate in abc2ps and the likes. In addition to the fact that there's too much space between parts to my taste

Re: [abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-25 Thread Gianni Cunich
On 25/06/01 at 18.24 Ronan KERYELL wrote: On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:57:17 +0200, Bert Van Vreckem [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Bert You're abusing the X: field for something it isn't designed Bert for. Sure. :-) Bert In an abc file, an X: field marks the start of a new tune Bert

Re: [abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-19 Thread James Allwright
On Mon 18 Jun 2001 at 05:07PM +0100, Phil Taylor wrote: I don't think you can do this by simply concatenating the MIDI files. I agree with this. Concatenating single track MIDI files could perhaps be done without too much analysis, but concatenating multiple track MIDI files would require

[abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-18 Thread Ronan KERYELL
To publish some music in MIDI format I need a MIDI version of the Unix cat... Rationale : My abc tunes are split in various X: tunes and abc2midi generates a MIDI file per X: tune. It would be more user friendly to have a single MIDI file for the whole tune so that I could also publish in MIDI

Re: [abcusers] MIDI cat ?

2001-06-18 Thread Bert Van Vreckem
Ronan KERYELL wrote: Rationale : My abc tunes are split in various X: tunes and abc2midi generates a MIDI file per X: tune. It would be more user friendly to have a single MIDI file for the whole tune so that I could also publish in MIDI format. You're abusing the X: field for something it