Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-06 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: >> Secondly, it is MUCH easier for a staff-notation generator to suppress >> the drawing of P: fields in every voice other than V:1 than it would >> be for a player program to locate P: fields outside of the voice that >> it is currently parsing and then figure out which point

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-05 Thread Jack Campin
>> It would look damn silly to have >> "Scherzo" or other section marker repeated in every single voice; > you can't use "Scherzo" to control part order - you've got > to use 'A'..'Z' as specified in the standard which you quote above. That's a limitation which should have been fixed long ago. O

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-05 Thread Phil Taylor
Laurie wrote: >Phil asked in passing "(Do any player programs other than BarFly currently >implement part-order playing in multivoice tunes? If so, how do they do >it?)" > >Muse doesn't. When I wrote the playing stuff I couldn't figure out how P: >was supposed to interact with repeat structures

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-05 Thread Laurie (ukonline)
Phil asked in passing "(Do any player programs other than BarFly currently implement part-order playing in multivoice tunes? If so, how do they do it?)" Muse doesn't. When I wrote the playing stuff I couldn't figure out how P: was supposed to interact with repeat structures, let alone voices -

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-04 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: >What the 1.6 standard says is > >: P - parts; can be used in the header to state the order in which >: the tune parts are played, i.e. P:ABABCDCD, and then inside the >: tune to mark each part, i.e. P:A or P:B. > >Parts of a voice are not parts of a tune. The way BarFly impl

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-04 Thread Jack Campin
>>> You have to put each P: field in all of the voices if you want >>> to control playing order. >>> Same goes for M: and K: fields (assuming that you want all the >>> voices to change metre and key at the same point). >> The latter pair is actually useful for some picese. > Yes, even Bach did it.

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-04 Thread Phil Taylor
Jeff Bigler wrote: >> You have to put each P: field in all of the voices if you want to >> control playing order. >> >> Same goes for M: and K: fields (assuming that you want all the voices >> to change metre and key at the same point). > >The latter pair is actually useful for some picese. To g

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-03 Thread Jeff Bigler
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:56:25 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Taylor) > > You have to put each P: field in all of the voices if you want to > control playing order. > > Same goes for M: and K: fields (assuming that you want all the voices > to change metre and key at the same point). T

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-03 Thread Phil Taylor
Jack Campin wrote: >> All fields in the tune (except possibly those which come before the first >> V: field) are voice dependent. After the first V: there is nowhere to >> put a field which is not within a voice, so all fields apply only to the >> voice in which they are located. > >How on earth

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-03 Thread Jack Campin
> All fields in the tune (except possibly those which come before the first > V: field) are voice dependent. After the first V: there is nowhere to > put a field which is not within a voice, so all fields apply only to the > voice in which they are located. How on earth does that let you control

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-02 Thread Luis Pablo Gasparotto
Thank you for the answer you were very clear. Kind regards, Luis Pablo Gasparotto Jean-Francois Moine wrote: TTY-Grin-jef-3CFA49A8.77A49C64@jef"> On Mon, 27 May 2002 17:03:17 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Taylor) wrote: Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote: Is the P: field voice d

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-06-02 Thread Jean-Francois Moine
On Mon, 27 May 2002 17:03:17 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Taylor) wrote: >Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote: > >>Is the P: field voice dependent or not? > >All fields in the tune (except possibly those which come before the first >V: field) are voice dependent. After the first V: there is nowhere to

Re: [abcusers] P: Field

2002-05-27 Thread Phil Taylor
Luis Pablo Gasparotto wrote: >Is the P: field voice dependent or not? All fields in the tune (except possibly those which come before the first V: field) are voice dependent. After the first V: there is nowhere to put a field which is not within a voice, so all fields apply only to the voice in

[abcusers] P: Field

2002-05-27 Thread Luis Pablo Gasparotto
Hi, Is the P: field voice dependent or not? If the answer is not, why abc2abc extracts it only for the last voice? Kind regards, Luis Pablo Gasparotto To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html