Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-16 Thread D-Man
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:55:07AM +0200, Anselm Lingnau wrote: [snip] Anselm, That was a nice way of describing the Open Source Software development model and how someone with a good idea and some motivation can convince others and benefit the community as well. It's a good way to end a flame

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-16 Thread Richard Robinson
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Anselm Lingnau wrote: > In fact there's nothing to keep *you* from going in and making and > publishing any changes to the code of, say, abc2ps or abc2midi that you > deem appropriate. (If you're not a programmer yourself, you can always > pay a programmer to implement the ch

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread John Chambers
Gianni rants: | Yet, we're still stuck to the old, unsatisfactory standard... why? | Because the discussion was left to the subscribers of this mailing | list. What actually happened is that an handful of developers - | which aren't even the majority of the abc related software | d

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread John Chambers
Bryan Creer writes: | Richard Robinson said - | >badmouthing doesn't really do anyone any good, does it ? | | Well, it seems to be a fairly common practice on this list when people can't | be bothered to give reasonable arguments. (That and picking up on other | people's spilling mistooks.) No,

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread Anselm Lingnau
Gianni Cunich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yet, we're still stuck to the old, unsatisfactory standard... why? > Because the discussion was left to the subscribers of this mailing list. > What actually happened is that an handful of developers - which aren't > even the majority of the abc related

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread Gianni Cunich
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 15/07/01 at 2.29 Richard Robinson wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Gianni Cunich wrote: > >> The key word is COMOPETENCE... > >Uh huh. > > > >> In other words, this is the attitude that will bring to the abc notation >> demise.Take your own responsabilit

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread Bryancreer
Richard Robinson said - >badmouthing doesn't really do anyone any good, does it ? Well, it seems to be a fairly common practice on this list when people can't be bothered to give reasonable arguments.  (That and picking up on other people's spilling mistooks.) Bryan Creer

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-15 Thread Phil Taylor
Richard Robinson wrote: >On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Gianni Cunich wrote: > >> The key word is COMOPETENCE... > >Uh huh. > It's what happens when you BOTH take viagra... Phil Taylor To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Re: [abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-14 Thread Richard Robinson
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Gianni Cunich wrote: > The key word is COMOPETENCE... Uh huh. > In other words, this is the attitude that will bring to the abc notation > demise.Take your own responsabilities about it, please! So, to cut a long story short, you don't like ABC ? So far as I'm concern

[abcusers] There is a dumb man...(used to be linux only ?)

2001-07-14 Thread Gianni Cunich
On 13/07/01 at 3.02 Anselm Lingnau wrote: >Gianni Cunich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Given this, If I really wish to use a flexible, user friendly notation >> package, like Melody Assistant (another software I am satisfied I have >> registered) or the NoteWorthy Composer, that's the rule...