Re: [abcusers] modes (again)

2002-06-30 Thread Bruce Olson
Here's a slightly improved version of the Key-Signature-Scoring mode graph or table now on my website. The numerical assignments (convenient but not unique) of key, signature, and mode) are for algebraic use in a computer, so you can ignore them when scoring or analyzing (descoring?) a tune by

[abcusers] modes (again)

2002-06-27 Thread Forgeot Eric
| ... It was already too late to change when I first mentioned it. Since it's not possible to add a new field dedicated to mode, I thought it was possible to write 2 K: fields in a tune, if necessary : the first one for the signature, and the second one to *precise* the mode used, so clever

Re: [abcusers] modes (again)

2002-06-27 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 17:59, Forgeot Eric wrote: | ... It was already too late to change when I first mentioned it. Since it's not possible to add a new field dedicated to mode, I thought it was possible to write 2 K: fields in a tune, if necessary : the first one for the signature, and

Re: [abcusers] modes (again)

2002-06-27 Thread Laurie (ukonline)
LaurieSure, but I've seen quite a few tunes with K:D and then every single C in the piece naturalised. In those cases invariably the description is half right - the tonic D is right, but the mode is wrong. Eric so does it means the right notation was to write K:Dm ? Probably K:Ddor Dm tends

Re: [abcusers] modes (again)

2002-06-27 Thread Bruce Olson
Laurie (ukonline) wrote: LaurieSure, but I've seen quite a few tunes with K:D and then every single C in the piece naturalised. In those cases invariably the description is half right - the tonic D is right, but the mode is wrong. Eric so does it means the right notation was to write