Re:[abcusers] suggestions for [A4A2] notation

2002-08-15 Thread Toni Schilling
Starling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Toni Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Question: applies the n to all notes in the chord as a multiplier or : only to those which have no length modifier? Guh, definitely not a multiplier. Until now I prefered multiplier because I could not

Re: [abcusers] suggestions for [A4A2] notation

2002-08-14 Thread ANewman110
In a message dated 8/13/2002 12:24:04 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (I think we *need* to specify the melody-note in some way because the w:-lines need it for alignment.) You're right about that. One of the few things the iabc currently gets right is aligning words with

Re: [abcusers] suggestions for [A4A2] notation

2002-08-14 Thread Starling
Toni Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : My vote is: first=melody shortest=length. I'll second that. : Question: applies the n to all notes in the chord as a multiplier or : only to those which have no length modifier? Guh, definitely not a multiplier. Even if you did eliminate one of

Re: [abcusers] suggestions for [A4A2] notation

2002-08-14 Thread Henrik Norbeck
I vote against allowing things like [Ad]8 Let's not make abc more complicated than needed. If you're writing for instance a bass part, just change the L: field for that voice if you find you're repeating too many [C,,8G,,8E,8] Henrik Norbeck, Stockholm, Sweden [EMAIL PROTECTED]