Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:05:16 +0530
Subject: Pathbreaking Indian Supreme Court Ruling
From: dnis.in...@gmail.com
To: 

We are very pleased to share with you the following news of a pathbreaking 
judgement given by the Indian Supreme Court. This judgement will have a far 
reaching impact and will certainly serve as a precedent in many more rulings 
and policy decisions to follow.

It is not so much about the right of an individual to a job even after 
acquiring disability (which had been established earlier also), but this 
judgement is about the employment rights of persons with mental disabilities.

Javed Abidi19.8.2013 -- 
Communication Unit: 
National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (NCPEDP)

A -77, South Extension Part II
New Delhi - 110 049, India
Tel.: 91-11-26265647 / 26265648 
Websites: www.ncpedp.org and www.dnis.org

Find us on Facebook and Twitter
Give the mentally-disabled a more suitable job: SC

Link: 
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Give-the-mentally-disabled-a-more-suitable-job-SC/Article1-1109600.aspx



State administration cannot dispense with ore reduce rank of a government 
servant if he or she acquires disability including mental illness or 
retardation during service, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Quoting the provisions of The Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunities, 
Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 a bench of Justice GS 
Singhvi and Justice SJ Mukopadhyaya held that if a person is found unsuitable 
for the post he or she holds on account of acquired disability during service, 
he or she should be moved to another post suitable to his or her state.

The bench further held that under section 47 of the Act if it wasn't possible 
to adjust such a person against any post, the government authority ought to 
keep him or her on a supernumerary post until a suitable one is available until 
the employee attains the age of superannuation.

With these observations the court recently directed the Union Ministry of 
Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to pay consequential benefits to a 
1977 batch IAS officer, Anil Kumar Mahajan, who was compulsorily retired from 
service on October 15 2007 after a disciplinary inquiry declared him insane. 
The inquiry report came 11 years after it was instituted in 1993 when he worked 
with the Bihar government.

At the time of inquiry the officer was placed under suspension twice. His 
representation for a voluntary retirement was turned down by the DoPT on the 
ground he hadn't completed the minimum service of 20 years. Later, however, the 
ministry compulsorily retired him.

Mahajan later challenged the findings of the disciplinary proceedings before 
the Central Administrative Tribunal, which turned down his plea.

However, on his appeal the SC set aside the order of compulsory retirement and 
said: "The appellant was appointed in the service of respondents as an IAS 
officer and joined in the year 1977. He served for 30 years till the order of 
his compulsory retirement was issued on October 15, 2007. It is not the case of 
the respondents (DoPT) that the appellant was insane and in spite of that he 
was appointed as an IAS Officer in 1977."

Observing "some problem was going on between the appellant and authorities of 
the state (Bihar)," the court said: "In view of the aforesaid finding, we are 
of the view that it was not open to the authorities to dispense with the 
service of  appellant or to compulsory retire him from service."

The court further said: "The High Court also failed to notice the relevant fact 
and without going into the merit allowed the counsel to withdraw the writ 
petition merely on the basis of the finding of Inquiry Officer."

Since in normal course Mahajan would have retired from service on July 31, 
2012, the SC directed DoPT to pay him the full salary, except the subsistence 
allowance already received, for the period from the date of initiation of 
departmental proceeding till his date of superannuation.



                                          
Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/

To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to