Hello
Pasting a posting from our member which did not come to the list.
Harish Kotian.



I do not know how I will thank you Vaishnavi for sending this.

We need to address the issue of revoking attempt to suicide as a criminal 
offence as well. Large percentage of persons with psycho-social disabilities 
are criminals under Section 309 IPC at present. What's the point of discussing 
Legal capacity issues in Draft New Law if we do not talk about all these?

Shampa Sengupta

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Vaishnavi Jayakumar 
<jayakumar.vaishn...@gmail.com> wrote:
Where exactly do the Aruna Shanbaugs of India belong?
Where do abandoned elders belong? Or incapacitated destitute Indians?

Who protects their rights?
Who safeguards their lives?

Is Aruna disabled according to current Indian legislation - draft bill or law?
If so would she be eligible for protection and guardianship under the National 
Trust Act or Disability Rights Authority?
Aruna has been physically and mentally incapacitated for over 3 decades now - 
so who should be her 'guardian'?

And who shall guard the guardians themselves?

WHO DECIDES? AND HOW?

The Unaware Mascot of Limbo Land


     ARUNA'S  CHOICE

It's time India established public guardianship procedures - our default 
assumption of sustained selflessness in long term familial or community 'duty' 
towards someone profoundly incapacitated, is facile.

What about people who are destitute? What when the family can't/won't continue 
providing care to the chronically incapacitated member? Suppose in that context 
a friend or random stranger IS willing and able?

What happens when noone cares?

'Alive' today, Aruna is a testament to the KEM's commitment and sustained, 
dedicated nursing. And I am truly awed by this phenomenon. What's disturbing is 
her sudden poster-girl status and the tug of war 'custody' battle between 
diametrically opposed parties who care for her. Albeit in different ways. Two 
actively pursued options for a victim trapped in a permanent vegetative state 
for decades, waiting for release. Passive prisoner in her own private hell, 
Aruna is powerless to make a decision one way or another.

It makes one wonder... Do we want people alive for their sake or for ours?

Death is a big deal in India - mostly for the people one leaves behind.
Sadly, an individual silently suffering in Life comes a dismal second.


http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?270853


                Society / Opinion
MAGAZINE | MAR 21, 2011


TV Grab: A file photo of 60-year-old nurse Aruna Shanbaug who, since the last 
37 years, has been living in a vegetative state in a Mumbai hospital. The 
Supreme Court dismissed a plea for the mercy killing of Aruna.
OPINION
You Are Herewith Sentenced To Life
Let Aruna die? No, with her alive, there's more power, media attention. Hence, 
the politics of mercy in medicine.
PINKI VIRANI
Lucknow airport. Late '90s. Khushwant Singh and I are waiting for our flights, 
we talk about Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee mentioning my book Once Was Bombay 
in a speech on collapsing cities. He suddenly asks, "You wrote that book on the 
woman who neither lives nor dies, you still see her?"
I say I'm banned by the hospital. Nothing new for me, though. Each time egos 
change-deans, doctors, matrons-I've redone the process with these authorities 
to stay in touch with Aruna Shanbaug. It's a pattern since 1982.
This time I should have been grateful for infrequent consent to visit her 
locked room. Instead, I had questioned their mandate. I had reported to 
newspaper editor Bachi Karkaria that the doctors had violated Aruna's right to 
live with dignity. They had withdrawn permission for her complete medical 
check-up. Granted, as it were, after my physical and telephonic running around 
for several agonising days.
The full medical in a private hospital, at no cost to this municipal hospital, 
would have inspected Aruna from head to toe. Testing would have ranged from 
blood-routine to vital organs and a brain-scan. A skilled anaesthetist would 
have made the procedures painless for Aruna. Her rotting teeth, due to infected 
gums, would have also been dealt with. An ambulance with a private doctor would 
have picked up Aruna in the night since she had not felt sunlight for more than 
two-and-a-half decades. I also signed a letter taking all responsibility.
The idea, after the complete examination, was to consult top medical minds. On 
their recommendation for follow-up treatment, I planned to approach the Bombay 
High Court and point out that since Aruna's medical care was at the mercy of a 
doctor-bureaucracy which had not conducted any further tests on its own, my 
husband and I-as responsible, tax-paying citizens-were willing to be appointed 
guardians. We would buy the best medicines, ensure the treatment.

Above is the pretty picture of Aruna, the one I released of a 16-yr-old. The 
62-yr-old reality is a twisted, brittle skeleton.

Aruna is denied the medical tests, permission withdrawn at the last hour. 
Reason given? None. After much angry persuasion, the response is the same as 
that given by the nurses when preventing her from receiving physiotherapy: 
"Supposing something happens to her?"
Aruna Shanbaug. Sodomised. Strangled with a dog-chain while being brutalised. 
Extensive brain stem injury, partially brain-dead. Cortically blind. Cannot 
speak. Or walk. No control over body movements. Administered mashed food, 
swallows automatically, upchucks equally. Teeth loosening and falling-one by 
one-on her bed. In pain. Shrieking. Howling. Weeping. Laughing manically. After 
the initial days, no medicines prescribed by the doctors, so none given.
Abandoned by friends; authorities don't encourage their visits as they are not 
blood relatives.Abandoned by relatives; they used to be constantly told by this 
free hospital to "take her home". I've been told too. I would if I could; but 
it doesn't change the fact that Nurse Aruna Shanbaug has every right to remain 
in that hospital. Hers is a case of aggravated sexual harassment and assault in 
the workplace. The hospital would have had to pay large cash compensation plus 
provide permanent care had her relatives been well-educated, not poor, and had 
access to a responsive legal system.
Abandoned, too, by municipal doctors; and here is the supreme irony. The daily 
devotion of her nursing colleagues has been so systematically thrust upfront 
that it has successfully masked the medical mismanagement of Aruna's case by 
key municipal doctors. Hypocrites also take the Hippocratic oath. After Aruna 
was brutally assaulted, no doctor at the hospital was willing to file a 
complaint that drew attention to the fact that she had been anally raped, even 
though there are now claimants to "being there first to treat her". The result: 
the sodomiser walked free after a mere seven years in jail for robbery.
And so, equally abandoned by the law.
Aruna Shanbaug. Born June 1, 1948. Murdered-but-not-killed November 27, 1973.
Khushwant Singh then asks his second question,
"You think there is a God?"
***
Delhi. 2009. I'm standing below the flag of India that flies above the main 
dome of the Supreme Court. I look up at it. If God has abandoned Aruna too, 
can't we at least ensure that her pain is validated by her country?
My plea as her "next friend" must have been heard by some divine force, 
listening in just then. For the Supreme Court decides to accord that dignity to 
Aruna Shanbaug which has been denied to her for more than three-and-a-half 
decades by admitting the case.
The plea simplified: Please define Right to Live with Dignity as enshrined in 
Article 21 of the Constitution. And if this is not it, please taper out the 
force-feed.
Cut to 2011. Because of the Supreme Court's orders, after 37 years, Aruna 
Shanbaug gets what she should receive annually: a medical check-up.
If I were consulted, I would have recommended two doctors. From the UK, where 
vegetative pain management intertwines with compassion. From Liege, where 
research combines with machines to evaluate levels of patient consciousness.
The medical report confirms that she fulfils most criteria of those in a 
permanently vegetative state. Such patients do not have favourite foods, music, 
people. Their smiles are not reactions to external influences. She is incurable.
But Aruna Shanbaug must not, cannot, die. Not when there are medical names 
involved in this medico-legal case. There are promotions, file-markings, 
resident quarters, spacious flats in prime residential areas. Everyone can move 
on to private practice or retirement; none need return to her locked room. 
Meanwhile, with Aruna alive, there is more power, more media attention, 
international conferences. And so they play their politics around the motives 
of mercy in medicine.
The medical report comes with a brief CD on Aruna as she is today. It is shown 
in the packed court-room.
The might of the state against the individual starts its road-roller grinding.
Look, no bed sores.
Listen, she is not completely brain-dead or she would not be making those 
noises.
See, she moved. She is not in a full coma.
Cures are being found everyday.
When the state is looking after the suffering, outsiders need not be concerned.
It is against Indian culture.
My poor, poor Aruna. All I have, standing in this one corner, is my choice to 
be morally accountable for you, no matter the consequences in the Court of God.
And then, his voice cutting through the clutter of righteousness, I hear the 
judge use the words "passive euthanasia".
***
This, too, is how landmark judgements come to a country.
Please see the Supreme Court website where it has been uploaded. Please see 
whether the court thinks Aruna's current situation is a "life" even though it 
rules that she must "live". The status quo of the caregivers as deciders of her 
fate has been maintained, but do read the bit that tells you they can approach 
the high court should they ever come to "change their mind".
Meanwhile, because of this broken woman denied the choice, all of India has 
one. Passive euthanasia is legalised-it remains in effect at least till 
Parliament rules otherwise-and none need suffer the way Aruna Shanbaug has. And 
continues to.
Another gift. The order on euthanasia offers clarity on organ donation in 
medico-legal cases. Crucial time tends to get lost over definitions of brain 
death, consequently healthy vital organs are frequently wasted.
That CD shown in the court? It is so gruesome that even the generally 
no-holds-barred regional television channels are unable to run it in full. 
Thus, what you have been seeing is the pretty picture, the one I released of a 
16-year-old girl who had it framed and put up in her village home before she 
left it.
The 62-year-old reality has been locked away. Always in pain, no palliatives 
prescribed. No teeth. White cropped hair. A feed-pipe running from her nose to 
her stomach. Feral sounds from a twisted and brittle skeleton. From which 
finger nails continue to grow, cut into her palms. Prone to diarrhoea, yet no 
catheter. Doomed to a very painful, and very slow, death.
Aruna Shanbaug. Prisoner of the state, held hostage by the quality of its mercy.
________________________________________
(Pinki Virani, a national award-winning author and activist, moved the Supreme 
Court on behalf of Aruna Shanbaug asking for her force-feeding to be stopped so 
that she could die peacefully. While not permitting that, the apex court 
delivered a landmark judgement on passive euthanasia.)
Click here to see the article in its standard web format



SUGGESTED READING (especially before responding!)

Definitions here: 
http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/sec16/ch212/ch212b.html

Interesting POVs here:
http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/072or054.html
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3004892.ece
http://omarkasule-04.tripod.com/id1334.html
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/11/detecting-consciousness-ways-t.html

And for assisted suicide, active / passive euthanasia and mercy killing 
disctinctions:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/activepassive_1.shtml
http://www.novelguide.com/a/discover/epop_01/epop_01_00118.html
http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/mental-health-ethics-euthanasia-139798.html
http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/wr1152009.pdf
http://www.columbianeuroicu.org/patient-information.html





________________________________
Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this 
e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone 
and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused 
by any virus transmitted by this email.
To unsubscribe send a message to
accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to