Re: [Ace] New OAuth client credentials RPK and PSK

How is this draft supposed to interact with draft-gerdes-ace-dtls-authorize? Jim From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Erdtman Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 1:03 AM To: ; ace Cc: Ludwig Seitz

Re: [Ace] WGLC on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token

From: Samuel Erdtman [mailto:sam...@erdtman.se] Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:40 AM To: Jim Schaad Cc: ace Subject: Re: [Ace] WGLC on draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token Hi Jim, Thanks for your review and comments, see some initial replies inline.

Re: [Ace] [OAUTH-WG] New OAuth client credentials RPK and PSK

Hi Torsten, That is a possibility, I excluded it to keep the scope limited and because I don´t think it is as applicable with these credential types. I think these credential types will mostly be used in IoT deployments using the ACE framework, in that case the token will have its own key that

Re: [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-gerdes-ace-dtls-authorize

+1 for adopting . yes, we will use (are using) DTLS in ACE(like) environments, having this profile will be very helpful good weekend On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Samuel Erdtman wrote: > +1 on adopting as a working group item. > > To me it makes sense to have a DTLS