Peter,
Did this registration attempt got concluded?
Ciao
Hannes
-Original Message-
From: peter van der Stok [mailto:stokc...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: 24 May 2018 15:55
To: Carsten Bormann
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; core; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] [Ace] Early media-type registration for EST ov
Since the registry that we are registering into does not fulfill the
preconditions of RFC 7120 Section 2 point (a), I think the next step is to send
the registration to IANA using the protocol parameters form [1]. The
application should reference the I-D as well as the message from the DE [2] —
On Jun 19, 2018, at 14:11, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
> Since the registry that we are registering into does not fulfill the
> preconditions of RFC 7120 Section 2 point (a),
(Sorry, wasn’t awake enough. If we go for the 256- space, of course it
does. And we probably do.)
So we’ll have to
Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2018, at 14:11, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>
>> Since the registry that we are registering into does not fulfill the
>> preconditions of RFC 7120 Section 2 point (a),
> (Sorry, wasn’t awake enough. If we go for the 256- space, of
> c
On Jun 19, 2018, at 16:33, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> We have already had some round trips and document changes thanks to Klaus
> Hartke.
Yes, but the IANA considerations section currently still has multict in it —
that might confuse IANA.
Grüße, Carsten
__
> -Original Message-
> From: Ace On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 7:33 AM
> To: core ; ace@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ace] [core] Early media-type registration for EST over CoAP
>
>
> Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > On Jun 19, 2018, at 14:11, Carsten Bormann
Based on where I currently am, here is another review of the document.
1. In section 4 for Figure one: Is the term "RS Information" your term or
an OAuth term. When I see this I think of it as information for not about
the RS which I do not believe is the intent.
2. In section 5.1 - I am uncl
Hi Jim,
I had a chat with Mike about relaxing the CWT-PoP spec to allow multiple PoP
keys in a single CWT token.
He is concerned about the departure from RFC 7800 and, after giving it a bit
more thoughts, I believe there is an issue. Initially, when we started the work
our promise was that thi
