Re: [Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz

2018-08-27 Thread Samuel Erdtman
+1 on pushing up error_description and error_uri I think client_id might be worth keeping low since it is often used even when in combination with client_secret. See OAuth Mtls as an example. On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 18:20, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ace On

Re: [Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz

2018-08-27 Thread Jim Schaad
> -Original Message- > From: Ace On Behalf Of Ludwig Seitz > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 12:52 AM > To: ace@ietf.org > Subject: [Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth- > authz > > Hello group, > > at IETF 102 there was a discussion about the numerical

[Ace] Parameter abbreviation number ranges for draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz

2018-08-27 Thread Ludwig Seitz
Hello group, at IETF 102 there was a discussion about the numerical abbreviations we introduced for both OAuth parameter names and access token claim names. I have generated a proposal that makes better use of the number space, but I'd like the OAuth specialists to have a look at it and see