Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-12 part 2

2019-09-03 Thread Peter van der Stok
Hi Ben, the last part of the responses to your thorough review. Apart from nits you found some "nice" mistakes. the openssl example make me worry a bit. See below. Peter ___ When requesting server-side key generation, the c

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-12 part 2

2019-09-03 Thread Jim Schaad
I have pruned and tossed in a few [JLS] comments. Jim From: Peter van der Stok Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:18 AM To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-coap-est@ietf.org; consulta...@vanderstok.org; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-c

[Ace] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (5852)

2019-09-03 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8392, "CBOR Web Token (CWT)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5852 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Laurence Lundblade Sec

Re: [Ace] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8392 (5852)

2019-09-03 Thread Jim Schaad
Recommend hold for update. -Original Message- From: RFC Errata System Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:57 AM To: m...@microsoft.com; e...@wahlstromstekniska.se; erdt...@spotify.com; hannes.tschofe...@arm.com; r...@cert.org; ka...@mit.edu; daniel.miga...@ericsson.com; i...@augustcell