Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] RE: Access token question

2020-02-24 Thread Jim Schaad
I have found that I had to put a scope encoding format into my database for each audience definition. Just saying that the scope is CBOR is not going to be sufficient, just like saying that it is a text string is not enough. For the text string side you have: * It is a text string *

[Ace] Scope question

2020-02-24 Thread Jim Schaad
I was starting to code up the encoding of scope and wanted to clarify what the encoding is. The text appears to say that the encoding is: scope = [ groupId: tstr, ?[* role : any ]] I was expecting this to be more along the lines of scope = [ + scope_item ] scopeItem = [ groupId: tstr, ?[* role

Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] RE: Access token question

2020-02-24 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2020-02-24, at 18:04, Jim Schaad wrote: > > • The proposal from Carsten that has not get adopted anywhere yet. Well, not adopted in the literal sense, but it has been used as a blueprint both in research works and in standardization. The main question that is holding this back from be

Re: [Ace] Scope question

2020-02-24 Thread Marco Tiloca
Hi Jim, On 2020-02-24 19:02, Jim Schaad wrote: > I was starting to code up the encoding of scope and wanted to clarify what > the encoding is. > > The text appears to say that the encoding is: > > scope = [ groupId: tstr, ?[* role : any ]] > > I was expecting this to be more along the lines of > >

Re: [Ace] Scope question

2020-02-24 Thread Jim Schaad
-Original Message- From: Marco Tiloca Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 2:14 PM To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-key-groupcomm-osc...@ietf.org Cc: 'Ace Wg' Subject: Re: Scope question Hi Jim, On 2020-02-24 19:02, Jim Schaad wrote: > I was starting to code up the encoding of scope and w

Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-08

2020-02-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Francesca, Sorry to cut this so close to the wire...I was on vacation and came back to a sizeable inbox. On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:55:29PM +, Francesca Palombini wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I am now done with updating the draft following most of your review comments. > Out of the 105, I have i