I have posted up the minutes for todays interim
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-ace-04/materials/minutes-i
nterim-2020-ace-04-202002251100
___
Ace mailing list
Ace@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
Hello Hannes,
We used broker as it is a widely accepted term in the MQTT Community for
"server" e.g.,
majority of the provider would list also a broker implementation to refer
to their server implementation.
With respect to whether 3.1,1 clients talking to v5, there may be some
issues. This is
Hi Ben,
No worries, I took enough time answering your review, on the contrary thank you
for making it before the interim!
I saw you already reviewed the PR, otherwise you can see the diff with the
latest submission more easily here:
Hi Cigdem, Hi Anthony, Hi Paul,
Why are you using the term MQTT broker? My understanding of the MQTT spec is
that there are only clients and servers - nothing more.
Is a MQTT v3.1.1 client able to talk to a MQTT v5 server? Would a MQTT v3.1.1
client talk to a MQTT v5 client via a server that
