Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor

2020-02-26 Thread Jim Schaad
From: Ace On Behalf Of Marco Tiloca Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 6:08 AM To: Michael Richardson ; Jim Schaad ; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor Hi! Jim, I think now I understand your idea and it makes sense to me. Some comments in line below.

Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor

2020-02-26 Thread Jim Schaad
-Original Message- From: Ace On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:17 AM To: Jim Schaad ; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor clarifying question. Jim Schaad wrote: > I do not seem to have been doing a good job of

Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor

2020-02-26 Thread Marco Tiloca
Hi! Jim, I think now I understand your idea and it makes sense to me. Some comments in line below. Best, /Marco On 2020-02-26 14:17, Michael Richardson wrote: > clarifying question. > > Jim Schaad wrote: > > I do not seem to have been doing a good job of explaining the issue > > that

Re: [Ace] Jim's Proposal on legal requestor

2020-02-26 Thread Michael Richardson
clarifying question. Jim Schaad wrote: > I do not seem to have been doing a good job of explaining the issue > that I am raising here, so I am going to go scenario based for a > description. > (1) I get an access token from an AS with a scope of [ > "coap://multicast-01",