Re: [Ace] Comments on the MQTT draft

From: Cigdem Sengul Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2020 3:30 PM To: Jim Schaad Cc: draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org; Ace Wg Subject: Re: Comments on the MQTT draft Hello Jim, Comments inline. On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 7:04 PM Jim Schaad mailto:i...@augustcellars.com> > wrote:

Re: [Ace] Comments on the MQTT draft

Hello Jim, Comments inline. On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 7:04 PM Jim Schaad wrote: > 1. I want to verify that the following is the desired statement: There is > a strong preference that TLS not use PSK for authentication. This follows > from the recommendation to use TLS:Anon-MQTT:ace for the

[Ace] Planning for the Vancouver Meeting

It appears that the logistics for the upcoming meeting in Vancouver are going to be more complicated than is normal. To start with at the present time it appears that neither of the chairs are going to be physically present for the meeting. Please let the chairs know if you desire to do a

[Ace] Comments on the MQTT draft

1. I want to verify that the following is the desired statement: There is a strong preference that TLS not use PSK for authentication. This follows from the recommendation to use TLS:Anon-MQTT:ace for the authentication option. I have no problems with this statement, I just want to be sure