A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Jim Schaad.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Security Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-ace-05
Thanks to Hannes and Jim for participating. Based on their feedback and in
deference to the ACE working group’s decision, I’m now willing to have the
registrations occur as specified in the draft.
Let’s give Chuck a day for him to either agree or disagree and then propose
that we proceed with
And I thought this was why we “hired” experts.
As has been noted previously in this discussion, there is no requirement that
the scope must be a text string, it can be a binary string as well. Further, I
believe that there will start being some dictionary work being done at some
point in
I had a weird weekend trying to get coverage testing up for my Observe
implementation and in the process found out that it had not implemented the
required congestion control. As part of this I had to go back and do a
careful read of RFC 7641 to get things right in my code and following that I
Hi all,
This is an interesting case.
CWT was created based on the work on ACE-OAuth. I would therefore agree with
Ludwig that it should receive priority treatment with regards to the selection
of the value encodings.
I do, however, also have sympathy for the argument Chuck mentioned regarding
