From: Cigdem Sengul
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 2:25 PM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org; Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-06
Hello Jim,
I understand that it's an optimization to improve message delay. I wonder also
Hello Jim,
I understand that it's an optimization to improve message delay. I wonder
also if a client then can do CONNECT - PUBLISH - DISCONNECT before
receiving a CONNACK as a best-effort publish? assuming CONNECT succeeds...
Should we just not cater to those cases?
What about stating in
From: Cigdem Sengul
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 10:45 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org; Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-06
I've got that from MQTT v5 spec:
If a Client sets an Authentication Method in the
>
>
> I've got that from MQTT v5 spec:
>
> If a Client sets an Authentication Method in the CONNECT, the Client MUST
> NOT send any packets other than AUTH or DISCONNECT packets until it has
> received a CONNACK packet [MQTT-3.1.2-30].
>
> and:
>
> If the Server rejects the CONNECT, it MUST NOT
From: Cigdem Sengul
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 8:50 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-prof...@ietf.org; Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-06
Hello Jim,
Responses inside.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:50 PM Jim Schaad
Hello Jim,
Responses inside.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:50 PM Jim Schaad
> wrote:
>
> Section 2.2.3 - /Clean Start to 0/Clean Start to 0, specify the previous
> session number/ - I think it should be stated that the session number is
> provided, which is what the state is associated