: chuck.mortim...@visa.com; cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org; drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
And I thought
ts-expert-rev...@iana.org
<mailto:drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org> ; ace@ietf.org <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
No you should not need to
e@ietf.org>;
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org>;
drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org>;
cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org<mailto:cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Req
-rev...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org; drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Please disregard the last message (small
.@iana.org>;
cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org<mailto:cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Fair enough, take my points as the author’s opinion only. That leav
: [Ace] [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Fair enough, take my points as the author’s opinion only. That leaves us with
3 experts to make the decision. Your position is clear, Chuck hasn’t commented
@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Ludwig, yes, while you’re a designated expert, note that the instructions to
the designated experts at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8392#section
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for
IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Hi Mike,
I will of course abide with a majority decision of the designated experts (note
that I’m one of them too). I would therefore
Seitz ; drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org;
cwt-reg-rev...@ietf.org; chuck.mortim...@visa.com;
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
RFC 8693
; chuck.mortim...@visa.com;
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-au...@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1158953] Requested review for IANA
registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (cwt - CBOR Web Token Claims)
Hello Mike, Chuck,
Thank you for clarifying your assessment Mike, thank you
10 matches
Mail list logo