Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-19 Thread elwynd
Hi, Ludwig.Thanks for the prompt response.Regarding he major issue, I understand what the intention of the split was, but as far as early implementations are concerned, there is no such thing as a 'minimal breakage'; unless there is some cunning mechanism in the basic ace-oauth-authz protocol,

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-21 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 2019-12-19 21:23, elwynd wrote: Hi, Ludwig. Thanks for the prompt response. Regarding he major issue, I understand what the intention of the split was, but as far as early implementations are concerned, there is no such thing as a 'minimal breakage'; unless there is some cunning mechanism in

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-21 Thread elwynd
Hi, Ludwig.Yes, -08 addresses the two points noted below... unfortunately you didn't fix the various nits and the other minor issues as you indicated you were intending to in your initial response (EC => EC2, etc).Enjoy the holidays!Cheers,ElwynSent from Samsung tablet. Original message

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-22 Thread elwynd
Hi, Ludwig.Having had another look at section 3.1 of draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, technically the rules about which keys have to be present are not part of the syntax of the cnf claim.  The point can be covered by changing '"syntax of the 'cnf' claim"to "syntax and semantics of the '

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-22 Thread Seitz Ludwig
Hello Elwyn, Sorry for being a pain. I have one more comment. /Ludwig (now finally from the corporate account) From: elwynd Sent: den 22 december 2019 19:27 To: Ludwig Seitz ; Elwyn Davies ; gen-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org Subject

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2019-12-23 Thread Jim Schaad
From: Ace On Behalf Of Seitz Ludwig Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 11:52 PM To: 'elwynd' ; Ludwig Seitz ; Elwyn Davies ; gen-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draf

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2020-01-07 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 2019-12-22 19:27, elwynd wrote: Hi, Ludwig. Having had another look at section 3.1 of draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, technically the rules about which keys have to be present are not part of the syntax of the cnf claim.  The point can be covered by changing '"syntax of the 'cnf' clai

Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-06

2020-01-08 Thread elwynd
Sent from Samsung tablet. Original message From: Ludwig Seitz Date: 07/01/2020 19:52 (GMT+00:00) To: elwynd , gen-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [Ace] Genart last call review of   draft-ietf-