Re: [Ace] [ace] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01.txt

2020-07-20 Thread Marco Tiloca
Hi Carsten, Thank you for this review! We have addressed your comments in the latest version -02. Please, see also our replies in line. Best, /Marco On 2020-05-18 13:40, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Comments are very welcome. > (1) I can’t parse > > the binary > representation

Re: [Ace] [ace] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01.txt

2020-05-18 Thread Carsten Bormann
> > Comments are very welcome. (1) I can’t parse the binary representation of the String value of ENCODED_TOKEN, which would depend on the used charset. What charset? JSON does not have a charset. (I’m probably misreading this.) What *is* the “String value of ENC

[Ace] [ace] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01.txt

2020-03-10 Thread Marco Tiloca
Hello ACE, We have submitted an updated version of draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tiloca-ace-revoked-token-notification-01 The document describes how an Authorization Server can notify Clients and Resource Servers of revoked but yet not expired Acce