Re: [Ace] CBOR Web Token (CWT) draft addressing shepherd review comments

2018-02-02 Thread Mike Jones
it. Grüße, -- Mike -Original Message- From: Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 9:28 PM To: Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> Cc: ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] CBOR We

Re: [Ace] CBOR Web Token (CWT) draft addressing shepherd review comments

2018-02-02 Thread Carsten Bormann
» Depending upon the values being requested, registration requests are evaluated on a Standards Track Required, Specification Required, Expert Review, or Private Use basis [RFC8126] « This might give the impression that IANA registrations can be made on a “Private Use” basis. RFC

[Ace] CBOR Web Token (CWT) draft addressing shepherd review comments

2018-02-02 Thread Mike Jones
The CBOR Web Token (CWT) specification has been updated to address the shepherd comments by Benjamin Kaduk. Changes were: * Updated the RFC 5226 reference to RFC 8126. * Made the IANA registration criteria consistent across sections. * Stated that registrations for the limited set