Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

2017-10-20 Thread Jim Schaad
palomb...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 6:21 AM > To: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap- > join...@ietf.org; draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-prof...@ietf.org > Cc: ace@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joinin

Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

2017-10-20 Thread Marco Tiloca
; To: draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-join...@ietf.org; draft-palombini-ace-coap- >> pubsub-prof...@ietf.org >> Cc: ace@ietf.org >> Subject: Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining >> >> After the interim meeting, I read this document through in order to produce >>

Re: [Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

2017-10-20 Thread Francesca Palombini
ilto:i...@augustcellars.com] > Sent: den 20 oktober 2017 07:42 > To: draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-join...@ietf.org; draft-palombini-ace-coap- > pubsub-prof...@ietf.org > Cc: ace@ietf.org > Subject: Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining > > After the interim meeting, I read this document

[Ace] Comments on draft-tiloca-ace-oscoap-joining

2017-10-19 Thread Jim Schaad
After the interim meeting, I read this document through in order to produce a review. Instead you are going to get a meta-review. I am having a hard to seeing why this document exists in its current form and it is not some type of simple profile of the pub-sub security draft. While I am not sure