Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

nt or not. > > > > Jim > > > > > > From: Ace On Behalf Of Jim Schaad > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2020 3:35 PM > To: 'Brian Campbell' ; 'Seitz Ludwig' > > Cc: 'Roman Danyliw' ; oauth-ext-rev...@ietf.org; 'Daniel > Migault' ; drafts-lastc...@ian

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

truggling to > understand. > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:54 AM Seitz Ludwig > wrote: > > > Hi Brian, > > > > > > > > Comments inline. > > > > > > > > /Ludwig > > > > > > > > *From:* Brian Campbell >

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

ana.org; 'Ludwig Seitz' ; 'Benjamin Kaduk' ; ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params I have managed to merge most of my code that deals with the confirmation claim and I have ended up with a single problem when dealing with conf

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

> > > > Comments inline. > > > > /Ludwig > > > > *From:* Brian Campbell > *Sent:* den 13 januari 2020 21:22 > *To:* Seitz Ludwig > *Subject:* Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params > > > > Thanks for

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

Cc: Ludwig Seitz ; Roman Danyliw ; oauth-ext-rev...@ietf.org; Daniel Migault ; Jim Schaad ; Benjamin Kaduk ; ace@ietf.org; drafts-lastc...@iana.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Thanks Ludwig, On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:20 AM

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

; oauth-ext-rev...@ietf.org; Daniel Migault ; Jim Schaad ; Benjamin Kaduk ; ace@ietf.org; drafts-lastc...@iana.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params Thanks Ludwig, On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:20 AM Seitz Ludwig mailto:ludwig.se

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

Thanks Ludwig, On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 8:20 AM Seitz Ludwig wrote: > [snip] > > > > *From:* Ace *On Behalf Of *Brian Campbell > > > [snip] > > > > So in -09 the "cnf" Introspection Response Parameter was the following the > syntax of the "cnf" claim from PoP Key Semantics for CWTs >

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

; ace@ietf.org; drafts-lastc...@iana.org Subject: Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params That certainly takes care of the registry conflict problem, thanks. I'm a little confused, however, and uncertain if that changes the syntax in a way that maybe wasn't

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

That "rs_cnf" claim registration request in 9.1 points to 3.3 which says it has 'the same syntax and semantics as defined in for the "rs_cnf" parameter', which I think is in 4.1. And 4.1 says that the "rs_cnf" values 'follow the syntax of the "cnf" claim from section 3.1 of

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

That certainly takes care of the registry conflict problem, thanks. I'm a little confused, however, and uncertain if that changes the syntax in a way that maybe wasn't intended? -09 had: cnf OPTIONAL. This field contains information about the proof-of- possession key that binds the

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

On 2019-12-23 22:32, Brian Campbell wrote: The OAuth Token Introspection Response registry already has an entry for "cnf", which makes the first request in

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:32:15PM -0700, Brian Campbell wrote: > The OAuth Token Introspection Response registry > > already has an entry for "cnf", which makes the first request in >

Re: [Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

The OAuth Token Introspection Response registry already has an entry for "cnf", which makes the first request in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.4 rather

[Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

Hello OAuth registry reviewers, the IESG-designated experts for the OAuth parameters registry have asked me to send a review request to you about the OAuth parameters registered here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.3 and the OAuth introspection response

[Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

Hello CWT registry reviewers, the IESG-designated experts for the CWT claims registry have asked me to send a review request to you about the "rs_cnf" claim registered here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.2 Thank you in advance for you review comments.

[Ace] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params

Hello JWT registry reviewers, the IESG-designated experts for the JWT claims registry have asked me to send a review request to you about the "rs_cnf" claim registered here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-07#section-9.1 Thank you in advance for you review comments.