[Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-02

2021-06-17 Thread Loganaden Velvindron
Dear All, After a quick check with the other working group chair, we are ready to proceed to WGLC for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap/ Please send your comments to the list. The WGLC period will end on the 1st of July. Kind regards, Daniel and Logan. __

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-02

2021-06-20 Thread Mohit Sethi M
The document is currently intended for standards track publication. But both the abstract and the introduction mention "describes a service".  You don't describe a standards specification. You define it? Moreover, I find the entire tone of the document to be somewhat lacking for a standards tra

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-02

2021-06-20 Thread Carsten Bormann
Hi Mohit, great review! There are a few places where I think you might be overcompensating, or where we actually have found good solutions previously that could be applied here. […] > "The URI of the CoAP-EAP service CAN be set to "/b"? First, > "CAN" is capitalized but it is not in the list o

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-02

2021-06-25 Thread Dan Garcia Carrillo
Hi Mohit: First of all, thank you very much for review. It is really appreciated and will help to improve the document. Please see our comments inline El 6/20/2021 a las 11:14 AM, Mohit Sethi M escribió: The document is currently intended for standards track publication. But both the abstr

Re: [Ace] WGLC for draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-02

2021-07-01 Thread Dan Garcia Carrillo
Hi Carsten, Thank you very much for contributing to the discussion. El 6/20/2021 a las 1:50 PM, Carsten Bormann escribió: Hi Mohit, great review! There are a few places where I think you might be overcompensating, or where we actually have found good solutions previously that could be appli