Sorry for being late- I also support adoption of this draft as it is a
natural optimization of EST making use of existing IoT device stacks.
Göran
On 2018-01-30 21:23, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote:
>This is the start of a two
, January 30, 2018 21:23
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of the
document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at the last
two meetings and has some
] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 21:23
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of the
document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at the last
30, 2018 12:23 PM
To: ace@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of the
document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at the last
two meetings and has some significant
I support the adoption of this draft. The industrial IoT sector is
establishing certificate based secure communications and will need a secure
means to manage these certificates. With the use of CoAp in that space, this
draft can be the what/how to achieve just that.
Warm regards, Nancy
On
ack to
UDP/CoAP."
--> Remove "networks of"
-
From: Ace [mailto:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shahid Raza
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 11:56 AM
To: Sandeep Kumar <sandeep.ku...@philips.com>
Cc: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com>; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] W
to:ace-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 9:23 PM
To: ace@ietf.org<mailto:ace@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of the
document draft-va
@ietf.org
Subject: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est
This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of the
document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at the last
two meetings and has some significant recent updates
Hi Jim,
I agree that this document should be adopted. I am willing to review
and comment.
Eli
On 30.01.18 21:23, Jim Schaad wrote:
> This is the start of a two week call for input on the adoption of the WG of
> the document draft-vanderstok-ace-est. The document has been presented at
> the