[Acegisecurity-developer] SEC-96 and backwards compatiblity

2006-05-31 Thread Ray Krueger
I looked at SEC-96 http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-96 and thought it would be an easy thing to jump on. The refactoring is actually very beneficial, as the Md5 and Sha PasswordEncoder classes were basically duplicates with one word changed (yuck). I've refactored that

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] SEC-96 and backwards compatiblity

2006-05-31 Thread Ray Krueger
Really, just scratch the thought. The BaseDigestPasswordEncoder is simple enough in it's purpose that I can leave it alone and put all my MessageDigest stuff in it's own subclass. On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at SEC-96

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I took the freedom also to tag the source tree and bump the pom versions to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take care of that On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we get the maven repos updated? Right now mvn compile fails because

[Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Ben Munat
Hi, We upgraded to the 1.0 final jar the other day and things worked fine on our dev build, which uses an InMemoryDao implementation. However, last night we tried to push out a build to the client and the context will no longer start due to a NoClassDefFound in the Acegi code.

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!

2006-05-31 Thread Ray Krueger
That should read: I saw that, should it have been 1.0.1 though? mashed the send button mid-correction hehe. On 5/31/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw that, my should it have been 1.0.1 though? On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I took the freedom also to tag the

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I'm afraid it's true. It no longer compiles under Spring 1.2.7. Something to log in JIRA for a 1.0.1. On 5/31/06, Ben Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We upgraded to the 1.0 final jar the other day and things worked fine on our dev build, which uses an InMemoryDao implementation. However,

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security 1.0.0 is released!

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Usually it's bumped to the main next release that will have new features. Not too important though. On 5/31/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That should read: I saw that, should it have been 1.0.1 though? mashed the send button mid-correction hehe. On 5/31/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Ray Krueger
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-288 I made it a blocker for 1.0.1 This means that the 1078 people that have downloaded 1.0.0 to this point cannot use Ldap correct? On 5/31/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm afraid it's true. It no longer compiles under

[Acegisecurity-developer] maven tests fail

2006-05-31 Thread Ray Krueger
I pulled an update from Subversion, and executed the following... cd core maven test The tests run and then build failed, test failures. One thing I've always wanted to know, and I know Carlos is going to have the quick answer on this... Where is one supposed to go to see what tests failed?

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Ben Munat
Thanks for entering the jira issue for me! I pulled from svn and built my own jar with only two changes and I think it's working now (the client hasn't called to complain yet :-) ). All I did was change two places that use EmptyResultDataAccessException to use the next superclass up, which is

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Luke Taylor
That's pretty much the fix that I put in earlier today - the same issue was raised in the forums yesterday http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?t=25430 and in Jira as SEC-281. Sorry it wasn't spotted earlier. Perhaps we should change the Spring maven dependency back to 1.2.8 to

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Sorry it wasn't spotted earlier. Perhaps we should change the Spring maven dependency back to 1.2.8 to detect this kind of thing? That's what i suggested some time ago. In fact for now only 1.2.7 is in ibiblio. ___ Home: http://acegisecurity.org

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Scott McCrory
Carlos Sanchez wrote: Sorry it wasn't spotted earlier. Perhaps we should change the Spring maven dependency back to 1.2.8 to detect this kind of thing? That's what i suggested some time ago. In fact for now only 1.2.7 is in ibiblio. Wouldn't that subsequently mean that Spring 2.x

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] ldap blowing up after upgrade to 1.0 final

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
In theory Spring is guaranteeing that 2.0 is backwards compatible, so if it works on 1.2.x it'll work on 2.0. In practice we could create a maven 2 profile setting the 2.0 dependencies and setting up continuous integration to build the default (1.2.x) and the profile too (2.x) On 5/31/06, Scott

[Acegisecurity-developer] Maven 2 repository

2006-05-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Remeber that there's a Maven 2 repository now at http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/repository/releases/ I just deployed the 1.0.0, with sources and javadocs. I changed maven deployed jars for the ones in the distribution because they are signed by Ben. It'll be synced to the main maven